![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It still surprises me that moving a lever to extend or retract gear makes an
aircraft complex. An autopilot or GPS is a lot more complex than a gear lever. Its called 'pilot workload'. In a real aircraft, you must: -Fly the Plane -Operate The Aircraft Systems -Keep track of your current location -Communicate with ATC -Keep Watch for Traffic -Plan your future track (or reference your flightplan), this includes making absolutely sure you remain clear of all restricted airspace. All in a reasonably loud, chaotic setting, with absolutely no option to 'pause'... Your sim covers 1 and 2 well... 3 and 6 ok (The various ways that simulators try and 'trick you up' navigation wise are very poor approximations of the real situations that come up... and restricted airspace is a non-issue). and 4 and 5 are jokes (pressing an 'acknowledge' button gives you absolutely no sense of how critical it is to keep constant track of ATC's dealings with the other aircraft around you... whose transmitters are 1960s vacuum tube technology and who all have different accents/ways of talking and traffic scanning on a monitor is nearly impossible)... So basically, in your little flight simulator, you are dealing with MAYBE half of the 'real-world' pilot workload... AND you have a pause when you get overwhelmed... Aircraft Systems (but not avionix) dictate an aircraft's complexity simply because those are the aspects of flying that the pilot cannot time-shift, cannot get away from, and who knows what else he'll need to be doing at the time. The complexity of an aircraft has nothing to do with its 'mean' level of pilot involvement, its the potential 'worse-case' level of pilot involvement (low on fuel, landing in the dark at an unknown towered airport, for example) that dictates it because there simply is no option for the pilot workload to exceed his capabilities at any point during the flight- the results would be fatal. Of course, you would know this if you had ever actually sat in a cockpit, instead of trying to tell us that we're incompetent because your little simulation (no matter how accurate it is at covering what it does) simply does not take into account the full range of experiences and requirements placed on a pilot... But I guess its my problem now because I'm bothering to respond. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 9, 1:33 pm, "EridanMan" wrote:
It still surprises me that moving a lever to extend or retract gear makes an aircraft complex. An autopilot or GPS is a lot more complex than a gear lever. Its called 'pilot workload'. In a real aircraft, you must: -Fly the Plane -Operate The Aircraft Systems -Keep track of your current location -Communicate with ATC -Keep Watch for Traffic -Plan your future track (or reference your flightplan), this includes making absolutely sure you remain clear of all restricted airspace. All in a reasonably loud, chaotic setting, with absolutely no option to 'pause'... I couldn't agree more! I have been in situations where I desperately wished I could pause the flight, one time it was because I was trying to work out where I was over hostile and rugged terrain with no landmarks at all, while having to fly around clouds, up valleys, not sure if my heading calculation worked out when I had to divert was correct, which was worked out using a map and protractor while flying through heavy turbulence, trying to keep the wings level with my knees while working the heading out, while dealing with an aircraft with absolutely no navaids and no gps, a badly drifting DG, and no way to fly straight and level long enough to reset it, flying over tiger country, and then I came to some flat land I found I was just about right above an airfield I didn't recognise that wasn't on the map, and having to scramble through my map collection to find that I'd gone off the edge of my map and was less than 1/4 mile from military airspace, all the while having to look out for other aircraft, and fly my aircraft, the one with two different wings that flies in circles unless you keep a heap of rudder in the whole time... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
chris writes:
I have been in situations where I desperately wished I could pause the flight, one time it was because I was trying to work out where I was over hostile and rugged terrain with no landmarks at all, while having to fly around clouds, up valleys, not sure if my heading calculation worked out when I had to divert was correct, which was worked out using a map and protractor while flying through heavy turbulence, trying to keep the wings level with my knees while working the heading out, while dealing with an aircraft with absolutely no navaids and no gps, a badly drifting DG, and no way to fly straight and level long enough to reset it, flying over tiger country, and then I came to some flat land I found I was just about right above an airfield I didn't recognise that wasn't on the map, and having to scramble through my map collection to find that I'd gone off the edge of my map and was less than 1/4 mile from military airspace, all the while having to look out for other aircraft, and fly my aircraft, the one with two different wings that flies in circles unless you keep a heap of rudder in the whole time... This is why God invented autopilots, copilots, and advanced instrumentation. It sounds like you drifted into this situation by not anticipating and planning beforehand. Necessary tasks that are deferred just tend to pile up, and then they all have to be done at once. There will always be some type of situation that is too complex to handle, no matter how much training or practice you have. It is therefore necessary to avoid such a situation. It traps even the best and most experienced of pilots. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
EridanMan writes:
Its called 'pilot workload'. In a real aircraft, you must: -Fly the Plane -Operate The Aircraft Systems -Keep track of your current location -Communicate with ATC -Keep Watch for Traffic -Plan your future track (or reference your flightplan), this includes making absolutely sure you remain clear of all restricted airspace. All in a reasonably loud, chaotic setting, with absolutely no option to 'pause'... Sounds doable, with a bit of practice. I don't have much trouble with it in the sim. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sounds doable, with a bit of practice.
Of course its doable, we do it all the time. I don't have much trouble with it in the sim. Utterly irrelevant statement... You mastery of an arbitrary task-load designed to approximate a pilot's workload with a substantially constrained interface says nothing. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: EridanMan writes: Its called 'pilot workload'. In a real aircraft, you must: -Fly the Plane -Operate The Aircraft Systems -Keep track of your current location -Communicate with ATC -Keep Watch for Traffic -Plan your future track (or reference your flightplan), this includes making absolutely sure you remain clear of all restricted airspace. All in a reasonably loud, chaotic setting, with absolutely no option to 'pause'... Sounds doable, with a bit of practice. I don't have much trouble with it in the sim. Snort! Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ID Please - Throttle Quad | Orval Fairbairn | Restoration | 0 | December 17th 05 08:35 PM |
Throttle movement | Max Richter | Naval Aviation | 12 | December 11th 04 11:09 PM |
Engine throttle | Bob Ingraham | Simulators | 13 | December 11th 04 07:17 PM |
Which throttle governer? | Garfiel | Rotorcraft | 1 | December 13th 03 04:30 PM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |