A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

VISUAL AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 4th 07, 07:28 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Derek Lyons
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 30
Default VISUAL AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION

Vince wrote:

Jack Linthicum wrote:
On May 3, 4:12 pm, Paul Elliot wrote:
Vince wrote:


http://new.photos.yahoo.com/paul1cart/albums/


Vince is a lawyer, he thinks that if he says the same wrong thing over
and over that will eventually make it true or the listeners will be
asleep. The Air Force Cross given Major Anderson must have been a real
goof by the Air Force and Kennedy.

http://cworld.clemson.edu/Fall2000/12thday.htm


There is nothing that prevents the president from giving a medal to an
air force officer flying for the CIA


You do know that the USAF operated U2's as well?

He was unquestionably engaged in an activity that was a violation of
international law. He could not have been "ordered" on the mission.


Um... Wrong.

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL
  #2  
Old May 4th 07, 01:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Vince
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 134
Default VISUAL AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION

Derek Lyons wrote:
Vince wrote:

Jack Linthicum wrote:
On May 3, 4:12 pm, Paul Elliot wrote:
Vince wrote:
http://new.photos.yahoo.com/paul1cart/albums/
Vince is a lawyer, he thinks that if he says the same wrong thing over
and over that will eventually make it true or the listeners will be
asleep. The Air Force Cross given Major Anderson must have been a real
goof by the Air Force and Kennedy.

http://cworld.clemson.edu/Fall2000/12thday.htm

There is nothing that prevents the president from giving a medal to an
air force officer flying for the CIA


You do know that the USAF operated U2's as well?


yes of course
but later

Operational history

Though both the Air Force and the Navy would eventually fly the U-2, it
was originally a CIA operation. Due to the political implications of a
military aircraft invading a country's airspace, only CIA U-2s conducted
overflights. The pilots had to resign their military commissions before
joining the CIA as civilians, a process they referred to as "sheep
dipping".[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_U-2



He was unquestionably engaged in an activity that was a violation of
international law. He could not have been "ordered" on the mission.


Um... Wrong.



It's an "unlawful order"

There is a difference between peacetime and wartime. The U-2
overflights violated international and domestic law. One of the reasons
we have the CIA is to have a system for dealing with the need to engage
in deliberate violations of international law.

Vince


  #3  
Old May 4th 07, 01:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Jack Linthicum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 301
Default VISUAL AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION

On May 4, 8:15 am, Vince wrote:
Derek Lyons wrote:
Vince wrote:


Jack Linthicum wrote:
On May 3, 4:12 pm, Paul Elliot wrote:
Vince wrote:
http://new.photos.yahoo.com/paul1cart/albums/
Vince is a lawyer, he thinks that if he says the same wrong thing over
and over that will eventually make it true or the listeners will be
asleep. The Air Force Cross given Major Anderson must have been a real
goof by the Air Force and Kennedy.


http://cworld.clemson.edu/Fall2000/12thday.htm


There is nothing that prevents the president from giving a medal to an
air force officer flying for the CIA


You do know that the USAF operated U2's as well?


yes of course
but later

Operational history

Though both the Air Force and the Navy would eventually fly the U-2, it
was originally a CIA operation. Due to the political implications of a
military aircraft invading a country's airspace, only CIA U-2s conducted
overflights. The pilots had to resign their military commissions before
joining the CIA as civilians, a process they referred to as "sheep
dipping".[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_U-2



He was unquestionably engaged in an activity that was a violation of
international law. He could not have been "ordered" on the mission.


Um... Wrong.


It's an "unlawful order"

There is a difference between peacetime and wartime. The U-2
overflights violated international and domestic law. One of the reasons
we have the CIA is to have a system for dealing with the need to engage
in deliberate violations of international law.

Vince


In the military there is a concept which we have seen rather
extensively in the past four years, it is called volunteering.

October 14: A U-2 flies over western Cuba, the first Strategic Air
Command (SAC) mission since authority for U-2 surveillance flights was
transferred from the CIA to the Air Force on October 12.
http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~hbf/missile.htm

and

As more U-2 missions, combined with HUMINT from inside Cuba, began to
build a case for the possible installation of nuclear missiles,
President Kennedy authorized an increase of U-2 missions over the
island. This increase in aerial reconnaissance coverage was caveated
with the limit that all future U-2 flights were to be conducted with
USAF personnel and U-2's from the Strategic Air Command. (124)
President Kennedy ordered the change from CIA to USAF missions in case
there were any shootdowns or losses. His reasoning was that USAF
pilots could be protected and treated as Prisoners of War versus CIA
pilots who would be considered spies. (125) In the meantime, the JCS
enlisted the support of additional aerial reconnaissance assets. Air
Force RB-47's were brought in to fly ELINT missions around the
periphery of the island along with USN F3D ELINT and EC-121 SIGINT
aircraft. (126)

124) In 1956, SAC rejected Kelly Johnson's U-2 design with General
LeMay quoted as saying he didn't need a glider with no guns or wheels
and if he needed aerial reconnaissance he'd use one of his B-36's. By
the time the U-2 program was approved and placed under SAC, he
understood the importance of having the aircraft because the CIA's
intelligence collection affected his bomber procurement. By 1960, SAC
had its own fleet of 24 U-2's and was using them for peripheral SIGINT
and PHOTINT missions.
(125) Jackson, 116.
(126) Lashmar, 191.

http://www.rb-29.net/HTML/77ColdWarS....02byndu-2.htm

I will keep this up until you stop making inaccurate statements

  #4  
Old May 4th 07, 01:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Jack Linthicum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 301
Default VISUAL AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION

On May 4, 8:15 am, Vince wrote:
Derek Lyons wrote:
Vince wrote:


Jack Linthicum wrote:
On May 3, 4:12 pm, Paul Elliot wrote:
Vince wrote:
http://new.photos.yahoo.com/paul1cart/albums/
Vince is a lawyer, he thinks that if he says the same wrong thing over
and over that will eventually make it true or the listeners will be
asleep. The Air Force Cross given Major Anderson must have been a real
goof by the Air Force and Kennedy.


http://cworld.clemson.edu/Fall2000/12thday.htm


There is nothing that prevents the president from giving a medal to an
air force officer flying for the CIA


You do know that the USAF operated U2's as well?


yes of course
but later

Operational history

Though both the Air Force and the Navy would eventually fly the U-2, it
was originally a CIA operation. Due to the political implications of a
military aircraft invading a country's airspace, only CIA U-2s conducted
overflights. The pilots had to resign their military commissions before
joining the CIA as civilians, a process they referred to as "sheep
dipping".[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_U-2



He was unquestionably engaged in an activity that was a violation of
international law. He could not have been "ordered" on the mission.


Um... Wrong.


It's an "unlawful order"

There is a difference between peacetime and wartime. The U-2
overflights violated international and domestic law. One of the reasons
we have the CIA is to have a system for dealing with the need to engage
in deliberate violations of international law.

Vince


I presume all of the people on these flights were dressed as Maytag
repairmen?

Cold war shoot downs: Part one
Air Classics, Apr 2001 by Larson, George A


DETAILING AMERICAN AIRCRAFT LOSSES IN THE DEADLY GAME Of GATHERING
INTELLIGENCE OVER THE SOVIET UNION

The Cold War between the United States and the former Soviet Union can
be traced to a diplomatic and arms race which started with a speech on
12 March 1947, in the United States. In this speech, before a Joint
Session of the United States Congress, President Harry S Tman
requested a one-time funding appropriation of $400,000,000 which
Congress approved. The funds requested were to provide military
assistance to a beleaguered Greek government to counter a Communist
insurgency in that country.

The term Cold War refers to an intense period of diplomatic and
military hostility, often through client states, blowing up during the
Cuban Missile Crisis which was a near nuclear confrontation between
the United States and the Soviet Union. This confrontation did not end
until the 1990s, with the tearing down of the Berlin Wall in Germany,
and the break up of what President Ronald Reagan referred to as the
"Evil Empire." During this Cold War, United States military aircraft
flew thousands of covert reconnaissance intelligence flights. These
intelligence collection flights gathered electronic signals and
photographic intelligence to verify and identify strategic targets in
the event of a nuclear war between the two Super Powers, and provide
the Strategic Air Command's (SAC) bombers penetration routes into the
Soviet Union.

These missions were classified top secret and considered high risk
military operations because of deliberate violations of Soviet air
space. When and where possible, the Soviet Air Force sent up fighters
to shadow US intelligence flights and to harass, intimidate, and shoot
down these aircraft. Some of these aircraft crew members were captured
by Soviet military forces, survived, and returned to US authorities.
There have been, over a period of years, supposedly live sightings of
American airmen at various confinement camps.
more

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...04/ai_n8949287

  #5  
Old May 4th 07, 01:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Vince
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 134
Default VISUAL AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION

Jack Linthicum wrote:
On May 4, 8:15 am, Vince wrote:
Derek Lyons wrote:
Vince wrote:
Jack Linthicum wrote:
On May 3, 4:12 pm, Paul Elliot wrote:
Vince wrote:
http://new.photos.yahoo.com/paul1cart/albums/
Vince is a lawyer, he thinks that if he says the same wrong thing over
and over that will eventually make it true or the listeners will be
asleep. The Air Force Cross given Major Anderson must have been a real
goof by the Air Force and Kennedy.
http://cworld.clemson.edu/Fall2000/12thday.htm
There is nothing that prevents the president from giving a medal to an
air force officer flying for the CIA
You do know that the USAF operated U2's as well?

yes of course
but later

Operational history

Though both the Air Force and the Navy would eventually fly the U-2, it
was originally a CIA operation. Due to the political implications of a
military aircraft invading a country's airspace, only CIA U-2s conducted
overflights. The pilots had to resign their military commissions before
joining the CIA as civilians, a process they referred to as "sheep
dipping".[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_U-2



He was unquestionably engaged in an activity that was a violation of
international law. He could not have been "ordered" on the mission.
Um... Wrong.

It's an "unlawful order"

There is a difference between peacetime and wartime. The U-2
overflights violated international and domestic law. One of the reasons
we have the CIA is to have a system for dealing with the need to engage
in deliberate violations of international law.

Vince


I presume all of the people on these flights were dressed as Maytag
repairmen?

Cold war shoot downs: Part one
Air Classics, Apr 2001 by Larson, George A


DETAILING AMERICAN AIRCRAFT LOSSES IN THE DEADLY GAME Of GATHERING
INTELLIGENCE OVER THE SOVIET UNION

The Cold War between the United States and the former Soviet Union can
be traced to a diplomatic and arms race which started with a speech on
12 March 1947, in the United States. In this speech, before a Joint
Session of the United States Congress, President Harry S Tman
requested a one-time funding appropriation of $400,000,000 which
Congress approved. The funds requested were to provide military
assistance to a beleaguered Greek government to counter a Communist
insurgency in that country.

The term Cold War refers to an intense period of diplomatic and
military hostility, often through client states, blowing up during the
Cuban Missile Crisis which was a near nuclear confrontation between
the United States and the Soviet Union. This confrontation did not end
until the 1990s, with the tearing down of the Berlin Wall in Germany,
and the break up of what President Ronald Reagan referred to as the
"Evil Empire." During this Cold War, United States military aircraft
flew thousands of covert reconnaissance intelligence flights. These
intelligence collection flights gathered electronic signals and
photographic intelligence to verify and identify strategic targets in
the event of a nuclear war between the two Super Powers, and provide
the Strategic Air Command's (SAC) bombers penetration routes into the
Soviet Union.

These missions were classified top secret and considered high risk
military operations because of deliberate violations of Soviet air
space. When and where possible, the Soviet Air Force sent up fighters
to shadow US intelligence flights and to harass, intimidate, and shoot
down these aircraft. Some of these aircraft crew members were captured
by Soviet military forces, survived, and returned to US authorities.
There have been, over a period of years, supposedly live sightings of
American airmen at various confinement camps.
more

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...04/ai_n8949287



Better give names dates and places of deliberate overflights of
territory, not cruisng past the border (airspace)


Vince
  #6  
Old May 4th 07, 02:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Jack Linthicum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 301
Default VISUAL AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION

On May 4, 8:48 am, Vince wrote:
Jack Linthicum wrote:
On May 4, 8:15 am, Vince wrote:
Derek Lyons wrote:
Vince wrote:
Jack Linthicum wrote:
On May 3, 4:12 pm, Paul Elliot wrote:
Vince wrote:
http://new.photos.yahoo.com/paul1cart/albums/
Vince is a lawyer, he thinks that if he says the same wrong thing over
and over that will eventually make it true or the listeners will be
asleep. The Air Force Cross given Major Anderson must have been a real
goof by the Air Force and Kennedy.
http://cworld.clemson.edu/Fall2000/12thday.htm
There is nothing that prevents the president from giving a medal to an
air force officer flying for the CIA
You do know that the USAF operated U2's as well?
yes of course
but later


Operational history


Though both the Air Force and the Navy would eventually fly the U-2, it
was originally a CIA operation. Due to the political implications of a
military aircraft invading a country's airspace, only CIA U-2s conducted
overflights. The pilots had to resign their military commissions before
joining the CIA as civilians, a process they referred to as "sheep
dipping".[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_U-2


He was unquestionably engaged in an activity that was a violation of
international law. He could not have been "ordered" on the mission.
Um... Wrong.
It's an "unlawful order"


There is a difference between peacetime and wartime. The U-2
overflights violated international and domestic law. One of the reasons
we have the CIA is to have a system for dealing with the need to engage
in deliberate violations of international law.


Vince


I presume all of the people on these flights were dressed as Maytag
repairmen?


Cold war shoot downs: Part one
Air Classics, Apr 2001 by Larson, George A


DETAILING AMERICAN AIRCRAFT LOSSES IN THE DEADLY GAME Of GATHERING
INTELLIGENCE OVER THE SOVIET UNION


The Cold War between the United States and the former Soviet Union can
be traced to a diplomatic and arms race which started with a speech on
12 March 1947, in the United States. In this speech, before a Joint
Session of the United States Congress, President Harry S Tman
requested a one-time funding appropriation of $400,000,000 which
Congress approved. The funds requested were to provide military
assistance to a beleaguered Greek government to counter a Communist
insurgency in that country.


The term Cold War refers to an intense period of diplomatic and
military hostility, often through client states, blowing up during the
Cuban Missile Crisis which was a near nuclear confrontation between
the United States and the Soviet Union. This confrontation did not end
until the 1990s, with the tearing down of the Berlin Wall in Germany,
and the break up of what President Ronald Reagan referred to as the
"Evil Empire." During this Cold War, United States military aircraft
flew thousands of covert reconnaissance intelligence flights. These
intelligence collection flights gathered electronic signals and
photographic intelligence to verify and identify strategic targets in
the event of a nuclear war between the two Super Powers, and provide
the Strategic Air Command's (SAC) bombers penetration routes into the
Soviet Union.


These missions were classified top secret and considered high risk
military operations because of deliberate violations of Soviet air
space. When and where possible, the Soviet Air Force sent up fighters
to shadow US intelligence flights and to harass, intimidate, and shoot
down these aircraft. Some of these aircraft crew members were captured
by Soviet military forces, survived, and returned to US authorities.
There have been, over a period of years, supposedly live sightings of
American airmen at various confinement camps.
more


http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...04/ai_n8949287


Better give names dates and places of deliberate overflights of
territory, not cruisng past the border (airspace)

Vince


Vince, you are lost. You can fiddle with whether a document is legit
or not and then turn around and say because a series of photographs
are examined at a CIA facility, actually manned by both CIA and
Pentagon people, that makes it a CIA job. Curtis Lemay made sure the
Strategic Air Command and secondarily the U.S. Air Force knew the
pilot that got those photos was a SAC pilot. Still need to explain all
those F8Us that got shot at in a non-battlefield.

Around noon that day (October 27) a Lockheed U-2 piloted by Rudolph
Anderson was shot down by an SA-2 Guideline SAM emplacement,
increasing the stress in negotiations between the USSR and the U.S. It
was later learned that the decision to fire was made locally by a
Soviet commander on his own authority, although exactly who this was
is a matter of some debate. Later that day, at about 3:41 p.m.,
several F8U Crusader aircraft on low-level recce missions were fired
upon, and one was hit by a 37 mm shell but managed to return to base.

  #7  
Old May 4th 07, 04:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Vince
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 134
Default VISUAL AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION

Jack Linthicum wrote:
On May 4, 8:48 am, Vince wrote:


http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...04/ai_n8949287

Better give names dates and places of deliberate overflights of
territory, not cruisng past the border (airspace)

Vince


Vince, you are lost. You can fiddle with whether a document is legit
or not and then turn around and say because a series of photographs
are examined at a CIA facility, actually manned by both CIA and
Pentagon people, that makes it a CIA job. Curtis Lemay made sure the
Strategic Air Command and secondarily the U.S. Air Force knew the
pilot that got those photos was a SAC pilot.



it was a CIA flight part of a long standing CIA operation




Still need to explain all
those F8Us that got shot at in a non-battlefield.


This is a separate issue
Francis Gary Powers was not in a battlefield

Around noon that day (October 27) a Lockheed U-2 piloted by Rudolph
Anderson was shot down by an SA-2 Guideline SAM emplacement,
increasing the stress in negotiations between the USSR and the U.S. It
was later learned that the decision to fire was made locally by a
Soviet commander on his own authority, although exactly who this was
is a matter of some debate.


Why should a "battlefield" shoot increase stress?
the reason is that its not a battlefield


Later that day, at about 3:41 p.m.,
several F8U Crusader aircraft on low-level recce missions were fired
upon, and one was hit by a 37 mm shell but managed to return to base.


Still not a "battlefield"

Vince
  #8  
Old May 4th 07, 04:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Jack Linthicum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 301
Default VISUAL AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION

On May 4, 11:07 am, Vince wrote:
Jack Linthicum wrote:
On May 4, 8:48 am, Vince wrote:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...04/ai_n8949287
Better give names dates and places of deliberate overflights of
territory, not cruisng past the border (airspace)


Vince


Vince, you are lost. You can fiddle with whether a document is legit
or not and then turn around and say because a series of photographs
are examined at a CIA facility, actually manned by both CIA and
Pentagon people, that makes it a CIA job. Curtis Lemay made sure the
Strategic Air Command and secondarily the U.S. Air Force knew the
pilot that got those photos was a SAC pilot.


it was a CIA flight part of a long standing CIA operation

Still need to explain all

those F8Us that got shot at in a non-battlefield.


This is a separate issue
Francis Gary Powers was not in a battlefield

Around noon that day (October 27) a Lockheed U-2 piloted by Rudolph
Anderson was shot down by an SA-2 Guideline SAM emplacement,
increasing the stress in negotiations between the USSR and the U.S. It
was later learned that the decision to fire was made locally by a
Soviet commander on his own authority, although exactly who this was
is a matter of some debate.


Why should a "battlefield" shoot increase stress?
the reason is that its not a battlefield

Later that day, at about 3:41 p.m.,

several F8U Crusader aircraft on low-level recce missions were fired
upon, and one was hit by a 37 mm shell but managed to return to base.


Still not a "battlefield"

Vince


http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/di...ba/cuba011.htm
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/di...ba/cuba013.htm
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/di...ba/cuba017.htm

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US aviation hero receives RP recognition [email protected] General Aviation 0 November 30th 06 01:14 AM
"Going for the Visual" O. Sami Saydjari Instrument Flight Rules 101 May 18th 04 05:08 AM
Face-recognition on UAV's Eric Moore Military Aviation 3 April 15th 04 03:18 PM
Visual Appr. Stuart King Instrument Flight Rules 15 September 17th 03 08:36 PM
Qn: Casein Glue recognition Vassilios Mazis Soaring 0 August 20th 03 10:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.