![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dale Alexander" wrote in message ... I went to Lycoming school several years ago. One of the memorable items mentioned was that if an owner re-clocks the prop to make hand-propping easier, cracks in aluminum brackets and filament failures in instrument bulbs most likely would result. The instructor mentioned that this was due to a high frequency vibration (one that the pilot may not notice) that would result from an out-of-balance condition. His moral to the story, if these conditions exixt on your plane, check the index position of the flange master dowel to the prop. Your combination was out-of-balance enough to notice before failures began. Dale Alexander It really is not my specialty, and I do not know in the case of aircraft engines, or for current production automotive engines, but it was common for manufacturers not to "zero balance" a lot of the older automotive engines. That means that the flywheel was heavier on one side because it acted as either all, or more likely part, of one of the crankshaft balance weights. Just a little "food for thought." Peter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Dohm" wrote It really is not my specialty, and I do not know in the case of aircraft engines, or for current production automotive engines, but it was common for manufacturers not to "zero balance" a lot of the older automotive engines. That means that the flywheel was heavier on one side because it acted as either all, or more likely part, of one of the crankshaft balance weights. That is now part of the function of the harmonic balancer, on today's auto engines. -- Jim in NC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 4, 5:01 pm, "Morgans" wrote:
"Peter Dohm" wrote It really is not my specialty, and I do not know in the case of aircraft engines, or for current production automotive engines, but it was common for manufacturers not to "zero balance" a lot of the older automotive engines. That means that the flywheel was heavier on one side because it acted as either all, or more likely part, of one of the crankshaft balance weights. That is now part of the function of the harmonic balancer, on today's auto engines. -- Jim in NC Sometimes. Many of them aren't heavy on one side. The "harmonic" part comes from the fact that it's two pieces of metal, an inner hub and outer ring, with rubber between them. The rubber-mounted ring (pulley) dampens the high-frequency vibrations created along the crankshaft, or "ringing," that can cause catastrophic crankshaft failure if its amplitude happens to increase at some resonant RPM. It's there to "detune" the crank. Short, stiff cranks usually don't need them. Dan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dan_Thomas_ wrote Sometimes. Many of them aren't heavy on one side. I'm not surprised. The engines I am most familiar with are weighted, but I don't have much exposure to a lot of engines. I should have used another weasel word like "some of." The "harmonic" part comes from the fact that it's two pieces of metal, an inner hub and outer ring, with rubber between them. Right, which is why I said "part of the function." -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Right prop, wrong prop? Wood prop, metal prop? | Gus Rasch | Aerobatics | 1 | February 14th 08 10:18 PM |
static prop hub for T-6 prop | ralph peterson | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | January 25th 04 04:06 AM |
Hydraulic CS prop converting to Adjustable prop? | Scott VanderVeen | Home Built | 0 | December 5th 03 05:54 PM |
Big Ol Prop | minot piper e | Restoration | 2 | November 12th 03 05:07 PM |
Metal Prop vs. Wood Prop | Larry Smith | Home Built | 21 | September 26th 03 07:45 PM |