![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 1:09 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: This matches with what I experienced recently. I was on the ground aboard a United passenger flight from Brazil to the USA and listening to the onboard channel 9 ATC to kill time. Except for the United and a Lufthansa pilot also awaiting clearance to taxi, every other pilot was talking Portuguese. The controllers spoke perfect ATC English but switched to Portuguese for the local pilots. I was thinking this could easily lead to a lack of situational awareness in a large airport like Sao Paulo's. You're not supposed to require any communication with anyone other than ATC, so if you need to hear other pilots on the frequency, there is a problem. Boy are you clueless... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 12:09 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: This matches with what I experienced recently. I was on the ground aboard a United passenger flight from Brazil to the USA and listening to the onboard channel 9 ATC to kill time. Except for the United and a Lufthansa pilot also awaiting clearance to taxi, every other pilot was talking Portuguese. The controllers spoke perfect ATC English but switched to Portuguese for the local pilots. I was thinking this could easily lead to a lack of situational awareness in a large airport like Sao Paulo's. You're not supposed to require any communication with anyone other than ATC, so if you need to hear other pilots on the frequency, there is a problem. You should try flying some time. There is a difference between "minimum requirements" and "useful information". -Robert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 In rec.aviation.piloting Robert M. Gary wrote: On Jun 29, 12:09 pm, Mxsmanic wrote: writes: This matches with what I experienced recently. I was on the ground aboard a United passenger flight from Brazil to the USA and listening to the onboard channel 9 ATC to kill time. Except for the United and a Lufthansa pilot also awaiting clearance to taxi, every other pilot was talking Portuguese. The controllers spoke perfect ATC English but switched to Portuguese for the local pilots. I was thinking this could easily lead to a lack of situational awareness in a large airport like Sao Paulo's. You're not supposed to require any communication with anyone other than ATC, so if you need to hear other pilots on the frequency, there is a problem. Pathetically clueless. Sometimes I feel I should pity you. But you're wrong most to all of the time, so I don't; you deserve the (negative) feedback you get for your mistakes. You should try flying some time. There is a difference between "minimum requirements" and "useful information". He already mentioned that he doesn't want to step foot anywhere inside a plane, but when is given the right information by pilots and controllers here and other places, he argues that they are wrong. Either way, back on topic. On the KLAS LiveATC feed today, a pilot was having radio issues (carrier, no voice). ATC couldn't hear him, but other pilots could. So ATC asked another pilot to relay what ATC was asking him to do. That worked and through that proxy pilot, ATC got that pilot back on the ground so he could work on the radio. Plus, Anthony, 4 words. Common. Traffic. Advisory. Frequency. BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! ![]() PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGhYvIyBkZmuMZ8L8RApKpAJ48aZ3G2N3sqPpFUKTvZc Xh6bpWCQCgvFfB ePAU8i++BzVpTyqgVp9QD1A= =+H2m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Guy Called Tyketto writes:
Plus, Anthony, 4 words. Common. Traffic. Advisory. Frequency. CTAF is not ATC. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 In rec.aviation.piloting Mxsmanic wrote: A Guy Called Tyketto writes: Plus, Anthony, 4 words. Common. Traffic. Advisory. Frequency. CTAF is not ATC. It doesn't need to be. Your exact quote: You're not supposed to require any communication with anyone other than ATC, so if you need to hear other pilots on the frequency, there is a problem. On the CTAF, you need to be able to be in communication with everyone other than ATC, (meaning, hearing other pilots on frequency). If you don't, there is a problem. Threaded newsreaders, as well as USENET archives, are so fun and easy to abuse. BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! ![]() PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGhzuKyBkZmuMZ8L8RAq27AKD1SSuSIgNkhI8kxtyWSD DPzDMRwACdEo7x QDbySmRquf5KKhZNnp5bPts= =ma/n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Guy Called Tyketto writes:
On the CTAF, you need to be able to be in communication with everyone other than ATC, (meaning, hearing other pilots on frequency). CTAF is not an ATC frequency. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 In rec.aviation.piloting Mxsmanic wrote: A Guy Called Tyketto writes: On the CTAF, you need to be able to be in communication with everyone other than ATC, (meaning, hearing other pilots on frequency). CTAF is not an ATC frequency. http://www.fordyce.org/scanning/scan...o/govtuse.html - --snip-- Aeronautical mobile service spectrum requirements are accommodated mostly in the HF (3-23 MHz) and VHF (117.975-137 MHz) portion of the radio spectrum. The VHF band provides the primary communications mode for Air Traffic Service (ATS) and Aeronautical Operational Control (AOC) safety communications for all areas of the world where radio line-of-sight services can be established. In the United States, this band is used by Federal Aviation Administration to provide ATS safety communications and by users such as, the airlines, business aviation, and general aviation to provide AOC safety communications. - --snip-- This covers all frequencies reserved for air traffic and control of such traffic, and implies that any of such frequencies can and may be used for *air traffic control*. Furthermo - --snip-- Each communications frequency is re-used as often as possible (due to the fixed number of available frequencies) so that continuous coverage can be established to support air traffic control systems. - --snip-- You will find that all CTAFs for various fields are within the above VHF range for such coverage for ATC systems. You will also find that most CTAF frequencies at fields that close for the night also are the Tower frequency for that field. In short, you are wrong. But I'm pretty sure you will argue that the information on that page is wrong, just like you do everything else in this world. Oh, btw.. Humidity was 30% in Oklahoma City today, and guess what.. it didn't rain! BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! ![]() PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGiJlhyBkZmuMZ8L8RAg6nAKD56/TAbroHXkRusD0TAgM6mJ+NVgCfdFdt i7FOfNYa8MKr0mYt4rH24U8= =Vlif -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: A Guy Called Tyketto writes: On the CTAF, you need to be able to be in communication with everyone other than ATC, (meaning, hearing other pilots on frequency). CTAF is not an ATC frequency. Bwahawahwhahawhawhawhaahwahwahwahwhahwhahwahwhahwh ahwahwhahwhahwhahwahhahhh ahwhahwahwhahwahwhahhahhahahwhah! Bertie |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why don't you go back to wherever you were for the past week and bother some
other people for a change? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
some of the 2nd~4th Aust Field Regt pose with their gear for their first ever drop - into Nadzab, Sep '43 | Dave Kearton | Aviation Photos | 4 | January 20th 07 03:17 AM |
Can I pose a hypotetical question | rojolo | Piloting | 10 | November 30th 05 04:00 PM |
Marines unable to take Fallujah | Bob Coe | Military Aviation | 26 | September 27th 04 12:47 AM |
CBS Newsflash: Rental trucks pose imminent and grave danger to national security | Ron Lee | Piloting | 4 | January 15th 04 03:07 PM |
Unable to use Baugher's site | Mike Zaharis | Military Aviation | 1 | November 20th 03 03:39 PM |