A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 11th 07, 12:12 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.soaring
Dave[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 186
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft

Are
you able to provide links to any forums or web sites related to this



Check this out: http://www.calcars.org/news-archive.html

David Johnson


  #2  
Old August 11th 07, 02:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 50
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft

On Aug 10, 5:12 pm, Dave wrote:
Are

you able to provide links to any forums or web sites related to this


Check this out:http://www.calcars.org/news-archive.html

David Johnson


Lithium Polymer batteries are widely used in RC planes, cars, etc and
are known to be potentially dangerous. Most runaway fires occur during
charging but it has also occurred to a lessor degree during discharge
and even storage. Vented charging safety bags are recommended for this
reason. There is a video on this link that shows the explosive power
of small LiPo's. Consider the size differance of these batteries to
the one hung under the trike in one of the first posts or those that
could be installed in the wings of a sailplane.
http://www.liposack.com/video.html

  #3  
Old August 11th 07, 04:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.soaring
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft

On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 06:59:02 -0700, wrote in
.com:


Lithium Polymer batteries are widely used in RC planes, cars, etc and
are known to be potentially dangerous. Most runaway fires occur during
charging but it has also occurred to a lessor degree during discharge
and even storage.


I would assume that the source of these Li-ion Polymer battery fires
is excessive electrical current flowing through the battery either
from too high a charging rate, too high a discharge rate, or a short
internal (as in the case of the Sony laptop cells) or external, or
being over charged. Perhaps it would be prudent to install a circuit
breaker of fuse to prevent too high a current and a timer to
disconnect a forgotten charger.

Vented charging safety bags are recommended for this
reason. There is a video on this link that shows the explosive power
of small LiPo's. Consider the size differance of these batteries to
the one hung under the trike in one of the first posts or those that
could be installed in the wings of a sailplane.
http://www.liposack.com/video.html

Thank you for the link. It is spectacular.


Here are some links relevant to the Sony Lithium laptop battery
recall:

Story: http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=32550
http://news.com.com/Dell+takes+heat+...3-6105828.html

Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeWq6...lated&search=#

Explanation of cause:
http://reviews.cnet.com/4660-10165_7-6625980.html
http://www.prnewstoday.com/release.h...H05424082006-1
The recall arises because, on rare occasions, microscopic metal
particles in the recalled battery cells may come into contact with
other parts of the battery cell, leading to a short circuit within the
cell. Typically, a battery pack will simply power off when a cell
short circuit occurs. However, under certain rare conditions, an
internal short circuit may lead to cell overheating and potentially
flames. The potential for this to occur can be affected by variations
in the system configurations found in different notebook computers.

  #4  
Old August 11th 07, 07:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.soaring
cavelamb himself[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft

The thing that strikes me most in this thread is that so many people
just don't seem to understand...

1) weight

2) power

3) scale

  #5  
Old August 13th 07, 10:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.soaring
Dana M. Hague
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 102
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft

On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 15:35:25 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote:

I would assume that the source of these Li-ion Polymer battery fires
is excessive electrical current flowing through the battery either
from too high a charging rate, too high a discharge rate, or a short
internal (as in the case of the Sony laptop cells) or external, or
being over charged. Perhaps it would be prudent to install a circuit
breaker of fuse to prevent too high a current and a timer to
disconnect a forgotten charger.


I imagine the root of the problem is very low internal resistance
which, while making them very efficient, also allows the current to
"run away". Good circuit design can alleviate many of the issues, but
safety if the batteries are damaged in a crash is still an issue.

-Dana
--
--
If replying by email, please make the obvious changes.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abandon all hope, ye who PRESS ENTER here.
  #6  
Old August 13th 07, 11:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.soaring
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 687
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft


"Dana M. Hague" d(dash)m(dash)hague(at)comcast(dot)net wrote in message
...
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 15:35:25 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote:

I would assume that the source of these Li-ion Polymer battery fires
is excessive electrical current flowing through the battery either
from too high a charging rate, too high a discharge rate, or a short
internal (as in the case of the Sony laptop cells) or external, or
being over charged. Perhaps it would be prudent to install a circuit
breaker of fuse to prevent too high a current and a timer to
disconnect a forgotten charger.


I imagine the root of the problem is very low internal resistance
which, while making them very efficient, also allows the current to
"run away". Good circuit design can alleviate many of the issues, but
safety if the batteries are damaged in a crash is still an issue.

-Dana
--


Any battery chemistry, including lead-acid, can overheat with excess
charging current - usually to the detriment of the battery and whatever it
is in at the time. All can do damage if they are shorted. The problem with
the first generation lithium cells was the chemistry released oxygen when
overheated which combined with the flammable lithium made an incendiary
bomb.

The newest lithium-nanophosphate cells do not release oxygen and thus do not
burn or explode although they can be damaged by overcharging. Cells made by
A123 Systems, Saft, Valence and others are more than safe enough for use in
aircraft or cars. They have a little less energy capacity than the old
chemistry but they make up for it with fast charging and long life. They
can typically manage a 20C discharge rate without harm - that's 200 amps for
a 10 AH battery. Admittedly, you don't want to short that.

Bill Daniels


  #7  
Old August 14th 07, 12:06 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.soaring
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft

On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:39:44 -0400, Dana M. Hague
d(dash)m(dash)hague(at)comcast(dot)net wrote in
:

safety if the batteries are damaged in a crash is still an issue.


I would think the hazard somewhat less than gasoline.

  #8  
Old August 14th 07, 02:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.soaring
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:39:44 -0400, Dana M. Hague
d(dash)m(dash)hague(at)comcast(dot)net wrote in
:

safety if the batteries are damaged in a crash is still an issue.


I would think the hazard somewhat less than gasoline.


The battery can produce it's own ignition source.


  #9  
Old August 14th 07, 04:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.soaring
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft

On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 08:40:29 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in
:

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:39:44 -0400, Dana M. Hague
d(dash)m(dash)hague(at)comcast(dot)net wrote in
:

safety if the batteries are damaged in a crash is still an issue.


I would think the hazard somewhat less than gasoline.


The battery can produce it's own ignition source.


You have a point. While a source of ignition (sparking wires, hot
muffler?) is required to ignite post-crash gasoline fumes, it would
take an un-fused short circuit or significant deformation of a battery
to potentially ignite a lithium battery. Granted, if the crash occurs
as a result of fuel exhaustion, there is little fire hazard, while the
lithium would always be aboard.


  #10  
Old August 12th 07, 02:47 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.soaring
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 687
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft

Please keep in mind that there are many lithium ion and lithium polymer
chemstries. It isn't too informative to just say "Lithium Polymer" or
Lithium Ion" without stating the precise chemistry. Further, chemistries
are changing almost daily. Many are proprietary. There's no such thing as
a "standard" lithium battery chemistry.

Valence, Saft and A123 Systems use chemistries that are far safer than the
relatively inexpensive Korean made model airplane batteries - safer than the
typical laptop or cell phone battery which are spec'd mainly on price.

Interestingly, the safest chemistries in the latest cells also offer faster
charging, greater energy density and will endure a FAR greater number of
charge cycles. They're also potentially cheaper.

I've already made a cell holder for A123 Systems "A1" cells. That's the
lithium phosphate nano cathode one used in 36V DeWalt power tools. You can
buy a couple of new DeWalt 36V power packs for $50 or so on Ebay. Then,
dismantle the pack to retrieve the individual cells. My pack will be 13.8
volts and 11AH weighing 3 pounds. It will be the same size as a 7AH 12V SLA
but weigh less than half as much.

Bill Daniels

Some Lithium cells can suffer thermal runaway and fire. Others are
extremely
wrote in message
oups.com...
On Aug 10, 5:12 pm, Dave wrote:
Are

you able to provide links to any forums or web sites related to this


Check this out:http://www.calcars.org/news-archive.html

David Johnson


Lithium Polymer batteries are widely used in RC planes, cars, etc and
are known to be potentially dangerous. Most runaway fires occur during
charging but it has also occurred to a lessor degree during discharge
and even storage. Vented charging safety bags are recommended for this
reason. There is a video on this link that shows the explosive power
of small LiPo's. Consider the size differance of these batteries to
the one hung under the trike in one of the first posts or those that
could be installed in the wings of a sailplane.
http://www.liposack.com/video.html



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Solar powered aircraft. Was: Can Aircraft Be Far Behind? Jim Logajan Piloting 4 February 9th 07 01:11 PM
World's First Certified Electrically Propelled Aircraft? Larry Dighera Piloting 2 September 22nd 06 01:50 AM
Powered gliders = powered aircraft for 91.205 Mark James Boyd Soaring 2 December 12th 04 03:28 AM
Is JB Weld electrically conductive? Scott Home Built 14 July 12th 04 11:24 PM
Help! 2motors propelled ultralight aircraft [email protected] Home Built 3 July 9th 03 01:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.