![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Le Chaud Lapin writes:
Obviously, any air above the wing can only result in a force downward on top of the wing. The only force causing the plane to want to move upward comes from beneath the wing. The effect of any air above the wing is to cause rarefication above the wing, resulting in lower pressure, thereby giving the 14.7lbs/in^2 (plus) to do its work. That "reaction" coming from downward movement of air seems just plain silly to me. Lift is a reaction to the force required to push air downward behind the wing (downwash). How the air gets pushed downward is not very important. The wing twists air into a downwash as it passes through it, leaving a swath of air moving gently downward behind it. The force required to do this engenders an equal and opposite force that is lift. Lift accelerates the wing upward, counteracting gravity. The wing accelerates a large mass of air downward. I am also inclined to take issue with the explanations of Bernouilli's Principle which I see often in the literature, but that's a different subject. [Note, I don't doubt Bernouilli's Principle, I just think there is more to it than the way it is being described in context of flying.] There are a lot of different ways to examine and describe the aerodynamics of lift. It boils down to accelerating one mass (a mass of air) downward, which engenders another acceleration of another mass (the wing, and anything to which it is attached) upward. Any flat surface moving relative to the air with a positive angle of attack below the stall angle will generate lift. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Le Chaud Lapin writes: Obviously, any air above the wing can only result in a force downward on top of the wing. The only force causing the plane to want to move upward comes from beneath the wing. The effect of any air above the wing is to cause rarefication above the wing, resulting in lower pressure, thereby giving the 14.7lbs/in^2 (plus) to do its work. That "reaction" coming from downward movement of air seems just plain silly to me. Lift is a reaction to the force required to push air downward behind the wing (downwash). How the air gets pushed downward is not very important. The wing twists air into a downwash as it passes through it, leaving a swath of air moving gently downward behind it. The force required to do this engenders an equal and opposite force that is lift. Lift accelerates the wing upward, counteracting gravity. The wing accelerates a large mass of air downward. I am also inclined to take issue with the explanations of Bernouilli's Principle which I see often in the literature, but that's a different subject. [Note, I don't doubt Bernouilli's Principle, I just think there is more to it than the way it is being described in context of flying.] There are a lot of different ways to examine and describe the aerodynamics of lift. It boils down to accelerating one mass (a mass of air) downward, which engenders another acceleration of another mass (the wing, and anything to which it is attached) upward. Any flat surface moving relative to the air with a positive angle of attack below the stall angle will generate lift. Nope. Bertie |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is clearly time to revisit airplanes taking off on tredmills.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tina wrote in news:1191401433.827965.190080
@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com: It is clearly time to revisit airplanes taking off on tredmills. Do tell. Must have been before my time here. Bertie |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It is clearly time to revisit airplanes taking off on tredmills. I have to agree. ANYTHING would be better than hearing the resident idiot troll's blithering. It goes something like this. An airplane is about to takeoff on a runway, that is really a treadmill; a very expensive treadmill. The treadmill senses the airplane's speed, and matches the aircraft's speed, with speed increases of its own. Can the airplane takeoff? Why or why not? -- Jim in NC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Morgans" wrote It goes something like this. An airplane is about to takeoff on a runway, that is really a treadmill; a very expensive treadmill. The treadmill senses the airplane's speed, and matches the aircraft's speed, with speed increases of its own. Can the airplane takeoff? Why or why not? I forgot one important qualifier of the treadmill's operation. It goes in the opposite direction of the intended direction of travel for the airplane. -- Jim in NC |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 3, 6:33 pm, "Morgans" wrote:
It goes something like this. An airplane is about to takeoff on a runway, that is really a treadmill; a very expensive treadmill. The treadmill senses the airplane's speed, and matches the aircraft's speed, with speed increases of its own. Can the airplane takeoff? Why or why not? I forgot one important qualifier of the treadmill's operation. It goes in the opposite direction of the intended direction of travel for the airplane. Tricky question. I will take a stab at it. You said "sense the airplanes speed". Relative to what? Assuming no friction between wheels and treadmill, the prop of the plane will cause the airplane to move in the wind. The speed "sensing" of the airplane by the treadmill does not really make sense and less you mean that the treadmill senses relative to the wind. If the treadmill senses that the plane has a relative wind speed of Vpw, and starts moving in the opposite direction, and the relative speed of wind against treadwill were nil before all this started, then the treadmill will only cause the wheels to turn twice as fast as they would have if the treadmill had not been moving. In this case, the speed of the plane relative to the treadmill will simply be twice the speed of the plane relative to the win, in opposite direction, of course. The plane will take off. If you mean to imply that there is some way for the treadmill to sense the speed of the plane relative to the treadmill, then adjust the speed of treadmill accordingly, of course, that won't work, as it is a circuitous proposition. -Le Chaud Lapin- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Morgans wrote: "Morgans" wrote It goes something like this. An airplane is about to takeoff on a runway, that is really a treadmill; a very expensive treadmill. The treadmill senses the airplane's speed, and matches the aircraft's speed, with speed increases of its own. Can the airplane takeoff? Why or why not? I forgot one important qualifier of the treadmill's operation. It goes in the opposite direction of the intended direction of travel for the airplane. Oh god,. imagine having been hios spiritual teacher when he was young. Do dogs get into heaven, et al... Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How much lift do you need? | Dan Luke | Piloting | 3 | April 16th 07 02:46 PM |
Theories of lift | Avril Poisson | General Aviation | 3 | April 28th 06 07:20 AM |
what the heck is lift? | buttman | Piloting | 72 | September 16th 05 11:50 PM |
Lift Query | Avril Poisson | General Aviation | 8 | April 21st 05 07:50 PM |
thermal lift | ekantian | Soaring | 0 | October 5th 04 02:55 PM |