A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Backwash Causes Lift?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 10th 07, 04:00 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,130
Default OK, IF Backwash Causes Lift then...

On Oct 9, 8:10 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote oups.com:

On Oct 8, 3:58 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip writes:
Fair enough, but the wing is behaving in exactly the same way.


The wings of fixed-wing aircraft behave the same way whether they are
gliders or powered.


Nope. The lift/drag vectors are different as the AOA
changes. The rest of Bernoulli/Newton still apply. For helicopter and
autogyro blades, the lift/drag vectors are similar except that in
autorotation there are propeller and autorotative regions of the
rotor.


OK, take your workd for it, but I thought Autogyros had pretty much
straight blades. Alpha is obviously going to be relative to distance to the
hub if the alpha is positive, but even so, you could look at it the same as
washout if I'm following you correctly.

Bertie


They do have straight blades, but the different velocities
found at various radii make the difference in AOA at thos points. In
forward flight it gets complicated. Here's a good link:
http://www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/...torotation.htm
Some helicopters have washout in the blades, but there are
still the rotational/advancing/retreating/radius issues to deal with.
I find it most amazing that helicopters flew successfully not all that
long after the Wright Brothers. The Germans had a workable machine in
the late '30s.
I thought helicopters were easy-to-understand machines until I had to
study them for my AME license. I like complex machinery, and these
things fit the bill. I have a little dual in an R44 and have great
respect for the folks who fly such ornery animals. Keep ya busy in a
hover.

Dan

  #2  
Old October 10th 07, 04:06 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default OK, IF Backwash Causes Lift then...

wrote in
oups.com:

On Oct 9, 8:10 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
oups.com:

On Oct 8, 3:58 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip writes:
Fair enough, but the wing is behaving in exactly the same way.


The wings of fixed-wing aircraft behave the same way whether they
are gliders or powered.


Nope. The lift/drag vectors are different as the AOA
changes. The rest of Bernoulli/Newton still apply. For helicopter
and autogyro blades, the lift/drag vectors are similar except that
in autorotation there are propeller and autorotative regions of the
rotor.


OK, take your workd for it, but I thought Autogyros had pretty much
straight blades. Alpha is obviously going to be relative to distance
to the hub if the alpha is positive, but even so, you could look at
it the same as washout if I'm following you correctly.

Bertie


They do have straight blades, but the different velocities
found at various radii make the difference in AOA at thos points.




OK, got it.


In

forward flight it gets complicated. Here's a good link:
http://www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/...idDynamics/Fly
i
ngDynamics/Aerodynamics/Lowspeed/Helicopter/Autorotation/Autorotation.



I'll decline if you don't min! It's late and the things scare the crap
out of me anyway.

h
tm
Some helicopters have washout in the blades, but there are
still the rotational/advancing/retreating/radius issues to deal with.
I find it most amazing that helicopters flew successfully not all that
long after the Wright Brothers. The Germans had a workable machine in
the late '30s.


Well, the austrians were flying tethered contraption in WW1 and there
were som other dubious things, but I know about Achgelis and Flettner,
allright. Cool machines that are too often forgotten.

I thought helicopters were easy-to-understand machines until I had to
study them for my AME license. I like complex machinery, and these
things fit the bill. I have a little dual in an R44 and have great
respect for the folks who fly such ornery animals. Keep ya busy in a
hover.



Yes, I've tried em and also got OK with RC helis, but the cost of
keeping those going was nuts! The real thing doesn't interest me much.
Too expensive noisy and slow.


Bertie


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How much lift do you need? Dan Luke Piloting 3 April 16th 07 02:46 PM
Theories of lift Avril Poisson General Aviation 3 April 28th 06 07:20 AM
what the heck is lift? buttman Piloting 72 September 16th 05 11:50 PM
Lift Query Avril Poisson General Aviation 8 April 21st 05 07:50 PM
thermal lift ekantian Soaring 0 October 5th 04 02:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.