![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 1-Jan-2008, wrote: The military usually takes holidays off unless someone is shooting at them, and even then sometimes. Everybodies military; if they don't the other side will get really suspicious. 2. I'm not sure that highlighting the incompetence of our Cold War-era Air Force is a good way to prove that handing over our home defense to the Air Guard has been a good idea. The fact that at the height of the Cold War our air and support crews predictably took weekends and holidays off -- and broadcast this status over walkie-talkies -- does NOT inspire confidence. It just doesn't get much dumber than that, tactically. Jim's thought about everybody's military taking normal time off to keep the other side from getting suspicious is probably a big clue why we were so open in our communications about ZULU and maintenance operations in general. I really don't think our Air Force was incompetent. Where there was need to keep things under wraps, we did a pretty good job of it. Remember how long the F-117 had been flying before it was revealed publicly? I know of a few other classified systems that we kept under wraps for some time until there was no longer a need for them to be kept secret. Ever hear of Combat Tree? It was a system we carried in our F-4s that could actively interrogate the Soviets' IFF systems or passively listen in on Soviet IFF replies to their own interrogations. It was a great thing for IDing and locating bogies. I worked on that one in our jets, and I know it was kept classified for a lot of years. We even had plastic "switch guards" we put on the control heads to keep our WSOs from being able to select the active interrogation mode accidentally, so the Soviets wouldn't detect the interrogation signal coming from our side and give away the capability we had. It was declassified just a few years ago. To put Jim's thought another way, if we kept the normal number of jets on alert and didn't work too hard at concealing what was going on in day-to-day operations, the Soviets would have no reason to think we were planning an attack and tensions between us could be kept low. I don't know too much about how the Soviets conducted their day-to-day operations, but everything I'd heard said that if they began preparing to attack NATO, we'd have ample notice. It's virtually impossible these days to prepare for an attack without undertaking preparations the other side is bound to detect. It was very easy to notice the disconnect between what Reagan and our government were saying about how dangerous the Soviets were and how relatively unconcerned our command staff seemed to be in real life. We certainly trained for combat, but I never felt as though war was imminent aside from when we bombed Libya. Then it got a little scary. Chernenko/Andropov/Gorbechev and the Soviet government were also frequently telling their people how evil we were and how they had to be prepared for a NATO attack, and I'd guess at the operational level they were probably about as relaxed as we were, call it relaxed vigilance on both sides. I used to be able to pick up Radio Moscow on my AM radio in my car and at home, and listening to their propaganda made it easy to see the exaggerations they told their people about us and start to see how a lot of what we were being told about them by our government was probably equally exaggerated. The threat of a Soviet invasion of NATO (and the threat that Saddam, Kim Il Jong, and Iran pose or posed to us) was certainly there but greatly exaggerated for our government's own purposes. In my humble opinion, of course. As for the incursions the Warsaw Pact did to check our responses, we did indeed do similar things. See : http://www.aiipowmia.com/koreacw/cw1.html for a list of our aircraft that the Soviets shotdown while on recon missions. There were other things we did that didn't involve overflying their territory. A friend of mine who flew RF-4Cs out of the 26 TRW at Zweibrucken once told me about one of his favorite missions, which he called "a Banzai run". The 26th had several airplanes modified with an electronic recon system called TEREC, which could detect and through triangulation fairly precisely locate radar emitters. The Soviets were usually pretty good about keeping most of their air defense radars turned off, so we wouldn't know where they were. Of course in planning for a war you'd want to know where ALL of their air defense radars are located. So on TEREC missions, they had the TEREC RF-4C flying at low altitude near the border to escape detection by the Soviets. In the meantime, another RF-4C flying over the middle part of West Germany would suddenly turn toward the border and accelerate as though they were going to blast across the border, turning back away from the border at the last second. Of course the Soviet defenses would immediately be put on alert, not knowing what this crazy American fighter was going to do, and all their radars would light up. In the meantime, the TEREC jet would pop up and cruise aong the border, recording and locating all of the emitters. For the question of the ANG operating the Air Defense units in the CONUS, I found a fascinating history of that on the Air National Guard's website. I was especially interested to see what Colin Powell as the Chairman of Joint Chief of Staff thought about alert aircraft in CONUS. Here is the pertinent section, from http://www.ang.af.mil/history/Herita...erTheStorm.asp Maintaining the air defense and air sovereignty of the CONUS were federal missions accomplished by 1st Air Force, a numbered air force (NAF) assigned to the ACC. In 1994, the Air Guard had begun taking over 1st Air Force which provided the command and control mechanisms for providing the air defense and air sovereignty of the continental United States. The original conversations proposing that transition had taken place between Maj. Gen. Killey, then ANG Director, and Gen. Robert D. Russ, then Tactical Air Command Commander, during 1990-1991. General Russ, a strong supporter of the Air Guard, had originated the dialogue. He had noted that all the fighter interceptor squadrons defending the CONUS by that time were ANG units. Defense of the homeland had seemed a natural fit for the Guard. The Air Force had wanted to transfer responsibility for resourcing that mission to the ANG primarily for two reasons. First, it had needed to reduce its own end strength because of post Cold War downsizing. Second, it had thought that the ANG was in a better position to politically defend that mission which had been coming under increasing attack as expensive and unnecessary. For their part, Air Guard senior leaders wanted to maintain as much of its fighter interceptor force structure as possible. Moreover, they needed to find new missions for much of its combat communications and tactical air control units which faced dramatic drawdowns in the early 1990s. The BRAC report of March 1993 gave the transfer proposal additional impetus. It directed the Air Force to either move the Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS) from Griffiss AFB, New York or give it to the ANG. Since ACC did not want to move it and was unable to consolidate it with another sector, transfer to the ANG appeared to be a logical choice. Following discussions between General Killey and senior Air Force leadership, agreement was reached to transfer the entire responsibility for 1st Air Force to the ANG. In September 1993, Secretary of Defense Les Aspin approved the transfer. On 28 January 1994, General Killey, who had just stepped down as Air Guard Director, assumed command of 1st Air Force as directed by General Merrill A. McPeak Air Force Chief of Staff. With that action, the main impetus for completing the transition to Air Guard control shifted to Tyndall AFB, Florida from the NGB, the Air Staff, NORAD, and Headquarters, ACC. However, the transfer was also intended to place the Chief of the NGB and the ANG Director in partnership with the Commander, 1st Air Force to assist the transition. Throughout the conversion process, all affected units had to maintain combat ready status. On 1 December 1994, Headquarters NEADS was redesignated Headquarters Northeast Air Defense Sector (ANG). During FY 1995, Air Force leadership directed the acceleration of the transfer process and won approval from the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs to hire an additional 182 AGR personnel to help accomplish that. In October 1995, the Southeast Air Defense Squadron and the Western Air Defense Squadron were constituted and allotted to the NGB. Command relationships for 1st Air Force were relatively complicated by traditional Air Guard standards. The NAF came under ACC. As the force provider to NORAD, ACC was responsible for providing organized, trained, and equipped units that maintained the air defense and air sovereignty for the Continental United States NORAD Region (CONAR). The NGB was responsible for ensuring that 1st Air Force was properly resourced, particularly its operations and maintenance as well as its military personnel budgets. ACC remained responsible for major systems acquisition including modernization of the NAF's sector and regional operations centers. NORAD continued as the war-fighting command that 1st Air Force was responsible to in the execution of its operational missions. All of this was further complicated by the fact that most 1st Air Force personnel were Guardsmen who remained in state status (Title 32, U.S. Code) while organizing, training, and equipping for their federal missions. They automatically converted to federal status (Title 10, U.S. Code) when actually conducting federal missions such as doing intercepts of unidentified aircraft entering U.S. air space because air defense and air sovereignty remained federal, not National Guard, missions. Likewise, certain officers including the ROC/SOC commanders always remained in Title 10 status to insure an unbroken federal chain of command. The size and composition of 1st Air Force's flying unit force structure continued to be a major issue during the transition. Over recent decades, the air defense interceptor force defending North America had been dramatically reduced from a high of 2,600 dedicated aircraft (including the Royal Canadian Air Force) in 1958. It had shrunk to 20 ANG fighters at 10 alert locations for CONAR by February 1996. However, 1st Air Force continued to face strong budgetary pressures to either eliminate or dramatically reduce dedicated ANG fighter interceptor units for the air defense and air sovereignty. The Office of the Secretary of Defense rejected efforts to include language in the FY 1996 and FY 1997 Defense Program Guidance to include air sovereignty and air defense as a stated mission and to program resources for them. In 1996, the General Accounting Office (GAO) criticized the Air Guard for continuing to maintain 150 fighters in 10 dedicated air defense units to defend the United States against invading enemy bombers at a cost of nearly $500 million annually nearly a half-decade after the Soviet Union's demise. The GAO urged that the 10 ANG units be either disbanded or given other missions. That criticism was well established in Washington, D.C. Gen. Colin Powell, while JCS Chairman, had advocated an end to dedicated continental air defense force in 1993 as had the GAO a year later. Both had suggested that general-purpose fighter forces of the Air Force, Navy and Marines -- active duty and reserve components -- could accomplish the mission. By the end of FY 1997, the ANG had assumed total responsibility for all of 1st Air Force including its three Regional Operational Control Centers and its Sector Operations Control Center as well as its NAF headquarters. The transition to the Air Guard was officially complete. Air Guardsmen had accomplished that unprecedented transition while retaining high readiness levels throughout the process. It represented a major change in the Air Guard's historic role, executing the command and control function for a full-time Air Force mission. But, 1st Air Force faced a difficult balancing act and an uncertain future. Continuing pressures to balance the federal budget and the absence of an international peer competitor suggested that the very survival of 1st Air Force, especially its dedicated fighter-interceptor force, would remain an issue. General Killey turned over responsibility for dealing with such questions when he relinquished command of 1st Air Force to Brig Gen Larry K. Arnold upon his retirement from active duty at Tyndall AFB, Florida effective 18 December 1997. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Magneto grounding Question | Doug Palmer | Home Built | 3 | October 8th 05 01:10 AM |
Antenna ground plane and coax grounding | G. Fred McCutchen | Home Built | 2 | August 8th 04 12:27 PM |
Grounding of K-7 and K-10s in the UK. | Robertmudd1u | Soaring | 1 | May 28th 04 02:53 AM |
Antenna Ground Plane Grounding | Fastglasair | Home Built | 1 | July 8th 03 05:21 PM |