A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Obstacle avoidance between take-off and airway



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 15th 08, 02:59 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Sam Spade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,326
Default Obstacle avoidance between take-off and airway

Mxsmanic wrote:

J.Kahn writes:


If no instrument departure gradients are published in a departure
procedure, then the default gradient requirement applies, which is 200
ft/NM.



OK, thanks.

It looks like IFR departures from runway 26 in L35 aren't allowed at all, so I
suppose I'll have to depart from runway 8 in the future if I really want to
depart IFR. Odd that there's nothing for runway 26 since it leads right over
the lake.


Gosh, I wish you would submit your resume to the FAA. Then, you could
be the boss of TERPS and get these credits for little narrow lakes
applied and forget the big friggen mountains a bit further out, you
numbskull.
  #2  
Old January 15th 08, 04:53 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Obstacle avoidance between take-off and airway

Sam Spade writes:

Gosh, I wish you would submit your resume to the FAA. Then, you could
be the boss of TERPS and get these credits for little narrow lakes
applied and forget the big friggen mountains a bit further out, you
numbskull.


The big mountains might or might not be a problem, depending on the aircraft.
  #3  
Old January 15th 08, 02:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Sam Spade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,326
Default Obstacle avoidance between take-off and airway

Mxsmanic wrote:

Sam Spade writes:


Gosh, I wish you would submit your resume to the FAA. Then, you could
be the boss of TERPS and get these credits for little narrow lakes
applied and forget the big friggen mountains a bit further out, you
numbskull.



The big mountains might or might not be a problem, depending on the aircraft.


Your judgment differs from the FAA's. Why don't you go argue with them:

http://naco.faa.gov/index.asp?xml=nfpo/west
  #4  
Old January 15th 08, 05:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Obstacle avoidance between take-off and airway

Sam Spade writes:

Your judgment differs from the FAA's.


I haven't seen an opinion from the FAA.
  #5  
Old January 15th 08, 06:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Sam Spade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,326
Default Obstacle avoidance between take-off and airway

Mxsmanic wrote:
Sam Spade writes:


Your judgment differs from the FAA's.



I haven't seen an opinion from the FAA.


I believe a judgment is different than an opinion. They denied an ODP
into those mountains; that is a fact. So go argue with them numbnuts.
  #6  
Old January 24th 08, 01:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
John[_14_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default Obstacle avoidance between take-off and airway

Sam Spade wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote:

J.Kahn writes:


If no instrument departure gradients are published in a departure
procedure, then the default gradient requirement applies, which is
200 ft/NM.



OK, thanks.

It looks like IFR departures from runway 26 in L35 aren't allowed at
all, so I
suppose I'll have to depart from runway 8 in the future if I really
want to
depart IFR. Odd that there's nothing for runway 26 since it leads
right over
the lake.


Gosh, I wish you would submit your resume to the FAA. Then, you could
be the boss of TERPS and get these credits for little narrow lakes
applied and forget the big friggen mountains a bit further out, you
numbskull.


At Canadian airports in the mountains where the required gradient is too
much they have a cat called "Spec Vis" which may involve a vfr initial
climb over the airport, then to a fix, then a shuttle climb to mea. See
the dep procedure for Prince George BC below. Do any US airports in the
hills do that?


DEPARTURE PROCEDURE
Rwy 09 - SPEC VIS - CLB visual over APRT
to 1200. Continue CLB on TRK 271 from
"YPW" NDB to 2400. Left turn direct
"YPW" NDB to cross at 3900. Shuttle
(max 200 kt) to MEA BPOC.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Final Glide Calculation over Obstacle [email protected] Soaring 3 February 7th 07 04:49 PM
How to adhere to this obstacle departure procedure? Peter R. Instrument Flight Rules 38 April 25th 05 09:00 PM
Garmin 196 & obstacle database. max Instrument Flight Rules 11 March 16th 05 08:51 AM
Obstacle Clearance Altitude / Height Tim Instrument Flight Rules 2 November 21st 04 10:33 AM
Notes on NACO Obstacle Departure Procedures John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 1 July 15th 04 10:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.