i think I flew into class c airspace accidentally withoutestablishing communication

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrote in message
...
Actually the original assertion was NOT that a VOR is required I listed a
whole bunch of devices that could apply. It was is a quick reply to Bertie
that only VOR was mentioned.

And even my original assertion was in reply to a student pilot that stated
everyone but instrument rated pilots should only be using charts as
primary navigation.


On 1/28/2008 "Gig 601XL Builder" asserted:

"Last time I checked celestial navigation wasn't in the PP requirements and
use of a VOR was."


And that was the quick reply to Bertie that I mentioned


God I love USENET.


That's an odd thing for you to say.



Yes, with guys like you on USENET it is.

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrote in message
...

On 1/28/2008 "Gig 601XL Builder" asserted:

"Last time I checked celestial navigation wasn't in the PP requirements
and use of a VOR was."


And that was the quick reply to Bertie that I mentioned


And it was incorrect as you never checked the PP requirenments and found use
of a VOR among them.




God I love USENET.


That's an odd thing for you to say.

Yes, with guys like you on USENET it is.


It's an odd thing for you to say because you appear quite stupid on USENET.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in
:


"Gig 601XL Builder" wrote in message
...

On 1/28/2008 "Gig 601XL Builder" asserted:

"Last time I checked celestial navigation wasn't in the PP
requirements and use of a VOR was."


And that was the quick reply to Bertie that I mentioned


And it was incorrect as you never checked the PP requirenments and
found use of a VOR among them.




God I love USENET.


That's an odd thing for you to say.

Yes, with guys like you on USENET it is.


It's an odd thing for you to say because you appear quite stupid on
USENET.


Actually, if anyone is prjecting an image of tpying by pounding on his
keyboard with his forehead and fists, it's you.


Bertie