Thielert (Diesel Engines)

On Feb 11, 9:23 am, Gig 601XL Builder
wrote:
Charles Talleyrand wrote:

Maybe diesel engines are catching on??????

Might want to read either last month's or the month's before Aviation
Consumer. Lots of maintenance and service issues.

And attitude issues...

In article Paul kgyy writes:
On Feb 11, 9:23 am, Gig 601XL Builder
wrote:
Charles Talleyrand wrote:

Maybe diesel engines are catching on??????

Might want to read either last month's or the month's before Aviation
Consumer. Lots of maintenance and service issues.

And attitude issues...

People actually pay for Aviation Consumer? I used to get their regular
teaser ads, and was not impressed. More sensationalism from picked details.
Some good stuff, but much of the real stuff was obvious.

Alan

Alan,

People actually pay for Aviation Consumer?


The most valuable 39 bucks (or whatever the subscription is) I spend
per year in aviation.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

Thomas Borchert wrote:
Alan,

People actually pay for Aviation Consumer?


The most valuable 39 bucks (or whatever the subscription is) I spend
per year in aviation.



I agree. I subscribed several years ago when my company was thinking of
buying a Cherokee 6 and I wanted access to the back issue database
online. I've read just about every word in each issue since.

No Ads means no advertisers they have to suck-up to.

People actually pay for Aviation Consumer?

The most valuable 39 bucks (or whatever the subscription is) I spend per
year in aviation.

I agree. I subscribed several years ago when my company was thinking of
buying a Cherokee 6 and I wanted access to the back issue database online.
I've read just about every word in each issue since.

Me, too. It's the ONLY magazine out there that actually tells it like it
is, without being influenced by advertisers.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

"Jay Honeck" wrote in
news:3ettj.35578$yE1.35574@attbi_s21:

People actually pay for Aviation Consumer?

The most valuable 39 bucks (or whatever the subscription is) I spend
per year in aviation.

I agree. I subscribed several years ago when my company was thinking
of buying a Cherokee 6 and I wanted access to the back issue database
online. I've read just about every word in each issue since.

Me, too. It's the ONLY magazine out there that actually tells it like
it is, without being influenced by advertisers.

Wouldn't take one for your cheesy hotel eh?

Bertie

On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 04:01:03 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote:

People actually pay for Aviation Consumer?

The most valuable 39 bucks (or whatever the subscription is) I spend per
year in aviation.

I agree. I subscribed several years ago when my company was thinking of
buying a Cherokee 6 and I wanted access to the back issue database online.
I've read just about every word in each issue since.

Me, too. It's the ONLY magazine out there that actually tells it like it
is, without being influenced by advertisers.


************************************************** ****************

Jay

You sweep with a broad brush. Do you read "Consumer Reports" ?

Big John

On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:04:41 -0600, Big John wrote:

You sweep with a broad brush. Do you read "Consumer Reports" ?

I pretty much ignored both Consumer Reports and Aviation Consumer until
they'd their articles on the Internet. It doesn't do me a lot of good to
have diesels reviewed on Monday if I'm not buying one until Thursday.

But with articles now available at the search of a keyword, I've become a
"subscriber" to both (though I wish AC permitted me to opt out of the
paper).

I know that this doesn't go directly to the issue of editorial honesty,
but I thought I'd point out a far more mundane task that both periodicals
have done right.

- Andrew