About Stall Psychology and Pilots

On Feb 22, 10:20 am, "gatt" wrote:
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in ...

Yangooooo.....listen....

Then nudge yoke foward. If the landing is super

Why would you have to "nudge" the yoke forward unless you're carrying too
much airspeed? In a proper Cessna 152 landing, you're pulling the yoke
back as you bleed off airspeed in order to ease the nosewheel down. There's
no forward nudging. The nose is going to come down eventually no matter
what.

Previously you wrote:
At the moment before touch-down push the yoke easy forward and I do a 3
point landing

That puts undue stress on the nosewheel, especially in a soft-terrain
environment. Published procedure is to hold the nosewheel off for as long
as possible (which is done by pulling back on the yoke) and ease it to the
ground as gently as possible.

FWIW, I definitely agree, I'm talking about hitting pavement.
It's the ground-effect that can keep the plane floating, that
is a mysterious effect (not really well understood) that does
happen at landings, but can be used to advantage, if you're
not a *fraidy cat*.
Once the rolling air from ground effect is achieved, a new
dynamic is effective. Of course that "rolling air" needs AoA
to be maintained, so nudging forward kills the "ground effect"
and you're very near a 3 point landing.
Maybe you guys want to analyse "ground effect lift".
Ken

Ken S. Tucker wrote:
On Feb 22, 10:20 am, "gatt" wrote:
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in ...

Yangooooo.....listen....
Then nudge yoke foward. If the landing is super
Why would you have to "nudge" the yoke forward unless you're carrying too
much airspeed? In a proper Cessna 152 landing, you're pulling the yoke
back as you bleed off airspeed in order to ease the nosewheel down. There's
no forward nudging. The nose is going to come down eventually no matter
what.

Previously you wrote:
At the moment before touch-down push the yoke easy forward and I do a 3
point landing
That puts undue stress on the nosewheel, especially in a soft-terrain
environment. Published procedure is to hold the nosewheel off for as long
as possible (which is done by pulling back on the yoke) and ease it to the
ground as gently as possible.

FWIW, I definitely agree, I'm talking about hitting pavement.
It's the ground-effect that can keep the plane floating, that
is a mysterious effect (not really well understood) that does
happen at landings, but can be used to advantage, if you're
not a *fraidy cat*.
Once the rolling air from ground effect is achieved, a new
dynamic is effective. Of course that "rolling air" needs AoA
to be maintained, so nudging forward kills the "ground effect"
and you're very near a 3 point landing.
Maybe you guys want to analyse "ground effect lift".
Ken

Good Grief!!

I swear you're turning me into Charlie Brown, Ken.
:-)

--
Dudley Henriques

"Ken ****head Tucker" wrote in
:



FWIW, I definitely agree, I'm talking about hitting pavement.
It's the ground-effect that can keep the plane floating, that
is a mysterious effect (not really well understood) that does
happen at landings, but can be used to advantage, if you're
not a *fraidy cat*.
Once the rolling air from ground effect is achieved, a new
dynamic is effective. Of course that "rolling air" needs AoA
to be maintained, so nudging forward kills the "ground effect"
and you're very near a 3 point landing.
Maybe you guys want to analyse "ground effect lift".
Ken


YOU don't know **** from Shineola when it comes to ground effect.

Benjamin Dover writes:

YOU don't know **** from Shineola when it comes to ground effect.

Since neither has anything to do with ground effect, why would that be a
problem?

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Benjamin Dover writes:

YOU don't know **** from Shineola when it comes to ground effect.

Since neither has anything to do with ground effect, why would that be a
problem?


You'll never fly so you'll never know.


Bertie

Mxsmanic wrote:
Benjamin Dover writes:

YOU don't know **** from Shineola when it comes to ground effect.

Since neither has anything to do with ground effect, why would that be a
problem?

My god you are ignorant.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

wrote in :

Mxsmanic wrote:
Benjamin Dover writes:

YOU don't know **** from Shineola when it comes to ground effect.

Since neither has anything to do with ground effect, why would that be a
problem?

My god you are ignorant.



His level of ignorance is unsurpassed in the annals of mankind.

writes:

My god you are ignorant.

That's a terrible thing to say about your deity.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

My god you are ignorant.

That's a terrible thing to say about your deity.

It can never be said enough; my god you are ignorant.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

writes:

My god you are ignorant.

That's a terrible thing to say about your deity.


Do you actually think you're going to convince anyone that you have a sense
of humor, tard-o-mat?


Bertie