A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AOPA and EAA come through on ADS-B Out NPRM



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 6th 08, 08:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default AOPA and EAA come through on ADS-B Out NPRM

On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 16:27:16 +0000 (UTC), Andrew Gideon
wrote in :

On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:00:31 +0000, Larry Dighera wrote:

What I find pathetic is the air carriers' vain hope that somehow ADS-B
OUT will provide relief from flight delays and the public scorn they
create.


I'm sure that they know better than to believe this.


Read their comment:

The Air Transport Association of America, Inc.[1] filed this comment:


http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspubli...ontentType=pdf
As FAA is well aware, important sectors of the NAS often approach
– and sometimes exceed – current capacity limits, especially when
weather affects the system, which causes flight delays,
inefficient routings and increased fuel consumption, in order to
maintain the highest level of system safety. ADS-B deployment and
NextGen offer significant improvements over the existing outdated,
radar-based ATC system. These additional reasons drive ATA’s
interest in this rulemaking proceeding.

See what I mean?

  #2  
Old March 6th 08, 08:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Lee[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 233
Default AOPA and EAA come through on ADS-B Out NPRM


The Air Transport Association of America, Inc.[1] filed this comment:


http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspubli...ontentType=pdf
As FAA is well aware, important sectors of the NAS often approach
– and sometimes exceed – current capacity limits, especially when
weather affects the system, which causes flight delays,
inefficient routings and increased fuel consumption, in order to
maintain the highest level of system safety. ADS-B deployment and
NextGen offer significant improvements over the existing outdated,
radar-based ATC system. These additional reasons drive ATA’s
interest in this rulemaking proceeding.

See what I mean?


Yet the FAA NPRM does not guarantee that implementation of ADS-B Out
will result in system capacity improvements...particularly en route
separation standards.

Here are words from the NPRM:

"At this time the FAA cannot determine the extent to which separation
standards might be reduced."

"The FAA may examine the possible reduction of separation standards
once ADS-B has been certified to meet existing separation standards
safely and consistently.

Ron Lee
  #3  
Old March 6th 08, 08:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default AOPA and EAA come through on ADS-B Out NPRM

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:34:17 GMT, (Ron Lee)
wrote in :


The Air Transport Association of America, Inc.[1] filed this comment:


http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspubli...ontentType=pdf
As FAA is well aware, important sectors of the NAS often approach
– and sometimes exceed – current capacity limits, especially when
weather affects the system, which causes flight delays,
inefficient routings and increased fuel consumption, in order to
maintain the highest level of system safety. ADS-B deployment and
NextGen offer significant improvements over the existing outdated,
radar-based ATC system. These additional reasons drive ATA’s
interest in this rulemaking proceeding.

See what I mean?


Yet the FAA NPRM does not guarantee that implementation of ADS-B Out
will result in system capacity improvements...particularly en route
separation standards.

Here are words from the NPRM:

"At this time the FAA cannot determine the extent to which separation
standards might be reduced."

"The FAA may examine the possible reduction of separation standards
once ADS-B has been certified to meet existing separation standards
safely and consistently.

Ron Lee



Right. It sort of makes one wonder about the competence of the ATAA.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FAA ADS-B Out NPRM needs your input Ron Lee[_2_] Piloting 24 November 27th 07 04:06 AM
FAA NPRM [author unknown] Casey Wilson Piloting 1 January 26th 07 06:11 PM
DC ADIZ NPRM Blueskies Piloting 3 August 17th 05 04:22 PM
DC ADIZ NPRM Blueskies Home Built 0 August 15th 05 11:41 PM
NPRM proposing to update the AC 43.13 2A - [email protected] Owning 0 January 3rd 05 03:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.