![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Schumann wrote:
"Most gliders aren't a hazard to airliners or other controlled traffic"????? What is the basis for that claim? There's IFR traffic everywhere. The stuff you see isn't the threat, it's the targets you don't. Anyone who thinks that they are immune from mid-airs because of where they fly is just rolling the dice. "Most" was too strong, so let me replace that with "At least half the gliders aren't a hazard...". It is a guess, but a reasonable one, I think. By "hazard", I mean that an IFR pilot might actually pause for a seconds before deciding to make the flight anyway, once he is informed about where the glider is. In other words, the risk to IFR traffic is so low, no one is worried about it. That situation describes a lot of training operations, ride operations, and even cross-country flights. The risk can be low for several reasons: *there aren't any airliners going through the area when the gliders are operating, and very few other IFR flights. *Or, operations are conducted in a manner where installing a transponder wouldn't change the risk significantly. For example, where procedures such as contact with the tower at the nearby field ensure separation. Yes, the odds are different in different places, but the risk is 0 everywhere. There are many places without airliners or IFR traffic. Lots and lots of small airfields, even municipal airports, simply don't attract that kind of traffic. I think it's important to recognize that not every airfield is not just outside a Class B airspace. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you are flying cross country, or even local, on a good day and are
getting up to 8-10K MSL, I don't care where you are in the country, there is a 0 chance that you may end up in the vicinity of an airliner or someone else flying IFR who thinks that ATC is protecting them from everyone else. Without a transponder, you have no protection. Outside of the $ involved, why would you not want everyone to have a transponder on board? Mike Schumann "Eric Greenwell" wrote in message news:JugJj.1492$at6.1201@trndny01... Mike Schumann wrote: "Most gliders aren't a hazard to airliners or other controlled traffic"????? What is the basis for that claim? There's IFR traffic everywhere. The stuff you see isn't the threat, it's the targets you don't. Anyone who thinks that they are immune from mid-airs because of where they fly is just rolling the dice. "Most" was too strong, so let me replace that with "At least half the gliders aren't a hazard...". It is a guess, but a reasonable one, I think. By "hazard", I mean that an IFR pilot might actually pause for a seconds before deciding to make the flight anyway, once he is informed about where the glider is. In other words, the risk to IFR traffic is so low, no one is worried about it. That situation describes a lot of training operations, ride operations, and even cross-country flights. The risk can be low for several reasons: *there aren't any airliners going through the area when the gliders are operating, and very few other IFR flights. *Or, operations are conducted in a manner where installing a transponder wouldn't change the risk significantly. For example, where procedures such as contact with the tower at the nearby field ensure separation. Yes, the odds are different in different places, but the risk is 0 everywhere. There are many places without airliners or IFR traffic. Lots and lots of small airfields, even municipal airports, simply don't attract that kind of traffic. I think it's important to recognize that not every airfield is not just outside a Class B airspace. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
(USA) NTSB issues recommendations to the FAA and the SSA regardingtransponder use in gliders | Sarah Anderson[_2_] | Soaring | 6 | April 1st 08 12:51 PM |
go to NTSB.GOV | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | August 15th 05 08:34 PM |
FAA-NTSB | [email protected] | Piloting | 4 | January 25th 05 01:34 PM |
NTSB | EDR | Piloting | 22 | July 2nd 04 03:03 AM |
NTSB 830.5 & 830.15? | Mike Noel | Owning | 2 | July 8th 03 05:51 AM |