![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Schumann wrote:
There are obviously some challenges in getting this commercialized. The biggest challenge is to get the FAA to accept the notion that there should be a VFR only version of ADS-B that is designed to be cost effective, and does not provide the accuracy and reliability levels needed for parallel instrument approaches in Class B airspace. My gut instinct (I don't have any experience dealing with the FAA) is that we can get the FAA to provide a mechanism so that this type of device can be sold commercially at a ~$1K price point. Politically, it would help a lot of the SSA, AOPA, and the EAA took the position that universal deployment would be acceptable, if equipment was available to the GA community at this price point. Certainly, AOPA is already doing that. See this for their position on ADS-B implementation: http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/air_traffic/ads-b.html Some highligts from that page: 4. The cost of the ADS-B datalink system must be at or below today's price of a Mode C transponder. 5. Once the ADS-B mandate becomes effective, aircraft should not be required to be equipped with a Mode C transponder. The AOPA-preferred UAT datalink is capable of providing pilots with three separate but related services: 3. FIS-B (Flight Information Services). FIS-B data includes graphic Nexrad weather radar and textual METAR/TAF data. In the future, FIS-B services may include graphic TFR data. I believe all glider pilots should also be members of AOPA. I've been one for more than 25 years. They do a lot heavy lifting that the SSA can not, related to airplanes (think towplanes), airspace, required equipment (ADS-B is the focus now), and pilot rights. The magazine is ocasionally interesting, and the dues are reasonable. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think that AOPA has gone as far as supporting mandatory ADS-B
deployment in aircraft without electrical systems, gliders, and balloons. They have been primarily focused on eliminating the current FAA strategy to require both Mode C and ADS-B on aircraft in Class B airspace and above 10K MSL. Mike Schumann "Eric Greenwell" wrote in message news:2XVJj.99$PJ3.18@trndny02... Mike Schumann wrote: There are obviously some challenges in getting this commercialized. The biggest challenge is to get the FAA to accept the notion that there should be a VFR only version of ADS-B that is designed to be cost effective, and does not provide the accuracy and reliability levels needed for parallel instrument approaches in Class B airspace. My gut instinct (I don't have any experience dealing with the FAA) is that we can get the FAA to provide a mechanism so that this type of device can be sold commercially at a ~$1K price point. Politically, it would help a lot of the SSA, AOPA, and the EAA took the position that universal deployment would be acceptable, if equipment was available to the GA community at this price point. Certainly, AOPA is already doing that. See this for their position on ADS-B implementation: http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/air_traffic/ads-b.html Some highligts from that page: 4. The cost of the ADS-B datalink system must be at or below today's price of a Mode C transponder. 5. Once the ADS-B mandate becomes effective, aircraft should not be required to be equipped with a Mode C transponder. The AOPA-preferred UAT datalink is capable of providing pilots with three separate but related services: 3. FIS-B (Flight Information Services). FIS-B data includes graphic Nexrad weather radar and textual METAR/TAF data. In the future, FIS-B services may include graphic TFR data. I believe all glider pilots should also be members of AOPA. I've been one for more than 25 years. They do a lot heavy lifting that the SSA can not, related to airplanes (think towplanes), airspace, required equipment (ADS-B is the focus now), and pilot rights. The magazine is ocasionally interesting, and the dues are reasonable. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
(USA) NTSB issues recommendations to the FAA and the SSA regardingtransponder use in gliders | Sarah Anderson[_2_] | Soaring | 6 | April 1st 08 12:51 PM |
go to NTSB.GOV | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | August 15th 05 08:34 PM |
FAA-NTSB | [email protected] | Piloting | 4 | January 25th 05 01:34 PM |
NTSB | EDR | Piloting | 22 | July 2nd 04 03:03 AM |
NTSB 830.5 & 830.15? | Mike Noel | Owning | 2 | July 8th 03 05:51 AM |