![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
... Interesting. Thanks for the information. How do you think it might affect a sailplane's L/D? Well, if the sailplane skin is transparent to radar a big reflector could be mounted inside, they don't weigh much. On the other hand a cylinder type reflector could be made quite aerodynamic and even incorporated into (say) the wing tips? Cheers That sounds like a very simple, inexpensive and effective solution to the issue. Best of all, the pilot can't turn it off. :-) Locally, approach radar has no trouble finding our transponderless gliders (when we call them), tracking them, and warning/diverting other traffic. We generally do this within 15-20 miles of our towered airports. It works well for us, given the altitudes we fly at. I don't know that a corner reflector would improve on the situation, or if they would detect the gliders without the radio call. While the pilot can't turn it off, it may be the controller doesn't notice it without the radio call, and may not be able to see it because of other clutter, or perhaps the display filter settings. It's worth contacting ATC in your area to see if they are willing and able to do the same for you. It's not practical everywhere, but it's cheap and easy if it is. A problem the reflector can not solve is TCAS will still not detect the glider. This might be deal-breaker for the FAA/NTSB people. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:20:30 GMT, Eric Greenwell
wrote in igcRj.6716$r12.4153@trndny03: Larry Dighera wrote: ... Interesting. Thanks for the information. How do you think it might affect a sailplane's L/D? Well, if the sailplane skin is transparent to radar a big reflector could be mounted inside, they don't weigh much. On the other hand a cylinder type reflector could be made quite aerodynamic and even incorporated into (say) the wing tips? Cheers That sounds like a very simple, inexpensive and effective solution to the issue. Best of all, the pilot can't turn it off. :-) Locally, approach radar has no trouble finding our transponderless gliders (when we call them), tracking them, and warning/diverting other traffic. We generally do this within 15-20 miles of our towered airports. It works well for us, given the altitudes we fly at. Thank you for this information. Would the gliders you mention be of glass-fiber, aluminum, or carbon-fiber composite construction? I would expect a glass ship with few metal parts to be rather transparent to radar. I don't know that a corner reflector would improve on the situation, or if they would detect the gliders without the radio call. While the pilot can't turn it off, it may be the controller doesn't notice it without the radio call, and may not be able to see it because of other clutter, or perhaps the display filter settings. I would guess the controller would need to adjust his scope from it's usual setting to see primary targets, so a radio call may be necessary. While a corner reflector would doubtless increase the radar energy returned to the radar antenna and provide a brighter primary target, I doubt that would be sufficient to cause the glider so equipped to become visible on ATC's scopes without reconfiguring them to display slow-moving primary targets. It's worth contacting ATC in your area to see if they are willing and able to do the same for you. It's not practical everywhere, but it's cheap and easy if it is. I'm not so much concerned about my personal situation as I am about the FAA rescinding the glider exemption from FARs that require transponder use. If we can give the FAA some guidance on this issue, the outcome will likely be more acceptable, than if the draft their NPRM without pilot input, IMO. A problem the reflector can not solve is TCAS will still not detect the glider. This might be deal-breaker for the FAA/NTSB people. I agree. But rescinding the glider exemption from FARs requiring transponder use won't address that issue with powered aircraft that lack an electrical system either. It looks like the FAA's response to this NTSB recommendation is destined to be a compromise at best. Hopefully it won't result in all gliders and aircraft without electrical systems being grounded until they have transponders installed and signed off. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 29, 5:51*am, Larry Dighera wrote:
I would guess the controller would need to adjust his scope from it's usual setting to see primary targets, so a radio call may be necessary. *While a corner reflector would doubtless increase the radar energy returned to the radar antenna and provide a brighter primary target, I doubt that would be sufficient to cause the glider so equipped to become visible on ATC's scopes without reconfiguring them to display slow-moving primary targets. How slow does a target need to be to be undisplayed -typically? I would have thought that even a glider is fast (45 knots) compared to usual clutter. Cheers |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:49:07 -0700 (PDT), WingFlaps
wrote in : On Apr 29, 5:51*am, Larry Dighera wrote: I would guess the controller would need to adjust his scope from it's usual setting to see primary targets, so a radio call may be necessary. *While a corner reflector would doubtless increase the radar energy returned to the radar antenna and provide a brighter primary target, I doubt that would be sufficient to cause the glider so equipped to become visible on ATC's scopes without reconfiguring them to display slow-moving primary targets. How slow does a target need to be to be undisplayed -typically? I would have thought that even a glider is fast (45 knots) compared to usual clutter. I have no idea, but just assumed it was a tunable parameter. Perhaps one of the ATC folks among the readership of these newsgroups may offer some input on that subject. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.aviation.soaring WingFlaps wrote:
On Apr 29, 5:51?am, Larry Dighera wrote: I would guess the controller would need to adjust his scope from it's usual setting to see primary targets, so a radio call may be necessary. ?While a corner reflector would doubtless increase the radar energy returned to the radar antenna and provide a brighter primary target, I doubt that would be sufficient to cause the glider so equipped to become visible on ATC's scopes without reconfiguring them to display slow-moving primary targets. How slow does a target need to be to be undisplayed -typically? I would have thought that even a glider is fast (45 knots) compared to usual clutter. A cruising glider is likely to be faster than that. However, gliders climbing in a thermal are making tight little circles, and I believe this will look like a stationary target to the radar. Worse, a glider climbing in wave really will *be* stationary, as the glider will try not to move by matching airspeed to wind speed at altitude. I have heard stories of unintelligent GPS units deciding the airplane was parked and shutting themselves off in this situation. -- Michael Ash Rogue Amoeba Software |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "WingFlaps" wrote in message ... How slow does a target need to be to be undisplayed -typically? I would have thought that even a glider is fast (45 knots) compared to usual clutter. There are two windmill farms about twenty miles northeast of Green Bay that break through the Moving Target Indicator. The windmills are stationary, of course, but the moving rotors are detected. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
WingFlaps wrote: How slow does a target need to be to be undisplayed -typically? I would have thought that even a glider is fast (45 knots) compared to usual clutter. Don't forget that it's the radial velocity that is detected by skin paint. -- Bob Noel (goodness, please trim replies!!!) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 4, 8:37*am, Bob Noel
wrote: In article , *WingFlaps wrote: How slow does a target need to be to be undisplayed -typically? I would have thought that even a glider is fast (45 knots) compared to usual clutter. Don't forget that it's the radial velocity that is detected by skin paint. Aha, someone who understands Dopplewho knows!. data from the secondary sites can fix that problem. Cheers |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.aviation.piloting WingFlaps wrote:
On May 4, 8:37?am, Bob Noel wrote: In article , ?WingFlaps wrote: How slow does a target need to be to be undisplayed -typically? I would have thought that even a glider is fast (45 knots) compared to usual clutter. Don't forget that it's the radial velocity that is detected by skin paint. Aha, someone who understands Dopplewho knows!. data from the secondary sites can fix that problem. The FAA radars are what they are. You can arm wave forever about what they could be, but that isn't going to change them. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Feds Want to Equipe Gliders With Transponders and Radios | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 155 | May 10th 08 02:45 PM |
Feds Want to Equipe Gliders With Transponders and Radios | Larry Dighera | Soaring | 12 | May 1st 08 03:42 PM |
Gliders, transponders, and MOAs | Greg Arnold | Soaring | 2 | May 26th 06 05:13 PM |
Transponders and Radios - USA | Ray Lovinggood | Soaring | 1 | February 27th 04 06:10 PM |
Transponders, Radios and other avionics procurement questions | Corky Scott | Home Built | 5 | July 2nd 03 11:27 PM |