![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 5, 8:58*am, sisu1a wrote:
Considering that prepregs have appx double the strength of the traditional wet layup construction... To the extent that that is true, it's also largely irrlevant to glider design. The reason we use carbon has much more to do with its stiffness than its strength. And prepregs offer only a rather modest stiffness/weight or stiffness/volume advantage over conventional vacuum-bagged carbon. However, they usually require the use of a high- temperature, high-pressure autoclave, and also specially-made high- temperature molds to go with it. Tooling like that can be quite expensive to buy and operate, and is quite difficult to amortize in the very marginal economics of sailplane development and manufacture. Thanks, Bob K. http://www.hpaircraft.com/hp-24 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thin Airfoil and Climb Performance | Brad[_2_] | Soaring | 16 | April 3rd 08 05:50 AM |
climb performance Jet vs Prop | xerj | Piloting | 11 | July 7th 06 06:31 AM |
Duo Turbo Climb / Altitude performance | Gary Emerson | Soaring | 16 | November 28th 05 08:19 AM |
relative climb performance | Soaring | 8 | September 17th 05 07:21 PM | |
172 N Climb Performance | Roger Long | Piloting | 6 | September 10th 03 11:18 PM |