![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"FUBAR7" wrote in message
... Mike wrote: "FUBAR7" wrote in message ... The world (And FAA Management) will never know Moving on to real air safety issues and not thread battles with some FAA sycophant(Mike)note the NAS is rapidly degrading. Notice the first paragraph of the news article from New York regarding the 2nd near pink mist at JFK WASHINGTON -- After another close call, the Federal Aviation Administration has finally changed its landing and takeoff procedure at Kennedy Airport. http://www.wnbc.com/news/16858119/detail.html The FAA is "FINALLY" changing their procedure?!?!!? NATCA has screamed for over 10 years the runway configuration was ****ED UP and a accident waiting to happen at JFK. FAA Management a.k.a. "The Tombstone Agency" FINALLY got around to it after TWO near DISASTERS??????? Like I said, a huge air disaster combined with high fuel prices "could" put a death spike into the airline industry. The FAILED policies of the FAA combined with FAA incompetent management has lead us down this road toward disaster for years. The old saying one straw will break the camels back?? Wait till a mid-air rains about 500 bodies and parts and goo over some metropolitan area All you FAA sycophants will be looking for new employment. Repeat after me............. "You want fries with that sir"?? Brings back fond memories of the '81 strike and running into former ATCSs who wanted the same pay as 747 captains and a 32 hour work week. At least the 2nd part panned out for them. The guys moving tin deserve a lot more money then the FAA managers sitting in some cubicle doing NOTHING that's for sure You don't move tin, Mr. Fubar. You sit in an ergonomically correct chair in a climate controlled room and speak into a microphone. The aircrews who you fantasize about their untimely demise move "tin". Furthermore many of those do actually work under very demanding conditions (unlike the ones you pretend to have), and many of those actually did get a substantial pay cut (unlike the one you pretended to have). You would do well to remember that, but I highly doubt you ever will and will intead chose to wallow in self-pity that nobody else cares about. So, I take it you want the controllers to work 50 hours a week and stay tired all the time like some worker in a tennis shoe factory huh?? I am sure they will remember that when you are low on fuel and lost in pea soup and the only thing between you and death is that controllers calm voice The best you can do is sit around and fantasize about an aircrew's demise so you can make your silly points about how "bad" you have it? You truly are a sad, pathetic individual. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What do you do in the real world? | Ron Garret | Instrument Flight Rules | 83 | March 15th 07 06:13 PM |
Real-world IFR currency | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | March 23rd 05 04:19 PM |
Real World Problem in FS9 | The Real Cali Kid | Simulators | 12 | December 6th 03 11:15 AM |
Real-time real world air traffic in flight sims | Marty Ross | Simulators | 6 | September 1st 03 04:13 AM |
Real World Specs for FS 2004 | Paul H. | Simulators | 16 | August 18th 03 09:25 AM |