![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Morgans" wrote: wrote Don't bother with center of mass. It's not really relevant. Indeed Angling the engine up 3.8 degrees would lead to trouble. That's a lot of angle. Absolutely Thrust works against the center of DRAG, which is much harder to locate than CG. Thanks for a verification of my thinking. Sorry. But all forces on a body act around it's centre of *mass* when considering its rotation. You can take the moments about anywhere fixed, but the CoM is what actually matters. As for angling the engine 3.8 degrees up being a bad idea, how can that possibly be? When you pull up to a high AOA, does the engine suddenly explode? No. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan Baker wrote:
In article , "Morgans" wrote: wrote Don't bother with center of mass. It's not really relevant. Indeed Angling the engine up 3.8 degrees would lead to trouble. That's a lot of angle. Absolutely Thrust works against the center of DRAG, which is much harder to locate than CG. Thanks for a verification of my thinking. Sorry. But all forces on a body act around it's centre of *mass* when considering its rotation. You can take the moments about anywhere fixed, but the CoM is what actually matters. I know you are trying to be helpful and you know that objects in free space rotate about their center of mass, but I'm fairly confident that aspects such as the center of pressure and affects on control surface authority need to be taken into account when changing the thrust line. As for angling the engine 3.8 degrees up being a bad idea, how can that possibly be? When you pull up to a high AOA, does the engine suddenly explode? No. A high angle of attack during cruise would presumably place the wings closer to their stall angle. I presume that is what makes it dangerous. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jim Logajan wrote: Alan Baker wrote: In article , "Morgans" wrote: wrote Don't bother with center of mass. It's not really relevant. Indeed Angling the engine up 3.8 degrees would lead to trouble. That's a lot of angle. Absolutely Thrust works against the center of DRAG, which is much harder to locate than CG. Thanks for a verification of my thinking. Sorry. But all forces on a body act around it's centre of *mass* when considering its rotation. You can take the moments about anywhere fixed, but the CoM is what actually matters. I know you are trying to be helpful and you know that objects in free space rotate about their center of mass, but I'm fairly confident that aspects such as the center of pressure and affects on control surface authority need to be taken into account when changing the thrust line. But by taking moments about the CoM, you can isolate the contribution of the engine and work to keep it the same despite the change in its location. That's precisely why you don't do it with respect to loci that change. Let's say the engine is mounted such that it is acting through the CoM, OK? In that case, changes in thrust cannot *possibly* cause any net torque, right? OK, move the engine up or down, and if you reangle it to set the thrust line through the CoM, then the same situation holds true. As for angling the engine 3.8 degrees up being a bad idea, how can that possibly be? When you pull up to a high AOA, does the engine suddenly explode? No. A high angle of attack during cruise would presumably place the wings closer to their stall angle. I presume that is what makes it dangerous. Not dangerous for the engine, though, right? -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Let's say the engine is mounted such that it is acting through the CoM, OK? In that case, changes in thrust cannot *possibly* cause any net torque, right? Yep. Drag is not at the center of mass OK, move the engine up or down, and if you reangle it to set the thrust line through the CoM, then the same situation holds true. Nope. Drag is not at the CoM -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Morgans" wrote: Let's say the engine is mounted such that it is acting through the CoM, OK? In that case, changes in thrust cannot *possibly* cause any net torque, right? Yep. Drag is not at the center of mass What does that have to do with my question? Take the air away for a moment and use a rocket. The only way to place it such that it won't cause a pitching moment is to align its thrust through the centre of mass, correct? OK, move the engine up or down, and if you reangle it to set the thrust line through the CoM, then the same situation holds true. Nope. Drag is not at the CoM Show your work or a reference... -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
thrust line for engine and not mounting engine on this thrust line | tommyann | Home Built | 8 | December 15th 06 03:31 PM |
Has something changed | [email protected] | Soaring | 10 | May 3rd 05 08:34 PM |
High thrust line on canard design? | Shin Gou | Home Built | 4 | March 5th 05 03:06 AM |
Getting students to line up with the center line | BoDEAN | Piloting | 27 | April 21st 04 11:23 AM |
I want to tell you something that has changed my life! | C J Campbell | Owning | 11 | January 29th 04 11:34 PM |