![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, let's do the math. The 320 has a best glide speed (max distance) of
about 220 mph while dropping about 1000 fpm at this speed. 220 mph = 3.66 mpm, or about 19,360 fpm. If you go forward 19,360 feet while dropping 1000 feet this is about a 19.36:1 glide ratio. Allowing for other factors not presented in the data I've seen, 15:1 is eminently reasonable for the A-320. Jim -- "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." --Aristotle "pintlar" wrote in message ... I have seen reported that the AirBus-320 has a glide ratio of 1:15. That was what our pilots told us the wings on Cessna 180-182 (L-19)'s glide ratio was. It does not seem consistent that a swept, thin airfoil, wing would have the same glide ratio as the Cessna. It is correct the AB-320 has a 1:15 glide ratio at zero power? Those pilots also said a B-52 and a grand piano have identical glide ratios. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
airbus - Latest Plane From Airbus.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 14 | June 26th 07 09:41 AM |
Which is easier: Boeing to Airbus, or Airbus to Boeing? | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 9 | February 21st 07 01:58 AM |
A question on Airbus landings | [email protected] | Piloting | 17 | July 18th 06 09:05 PM |
Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good | Excelsior | Home Built | 0 | April 22nd 05 01:11 AM |
Airbus | Ace | Simulators | 0 | March 2nd 05 05:13 PM |