![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RST Engineering - JIm" wrote in message m... NiCads a a. Horrible for the enviornment (that's the Cad part of NiCad) b. Have a lousy self-discharge characteristic c. Are relatively expensive. NiMH a a. Not too harmful of Mother Nature b. Have a fairly decent self-discharge characteristic c. Are relatively inexpensive (check out thomasdistributing.com) You may also look into a LiIon pack, depending on which radio you buy. THey are even better than NiMH. Jim I do not disagree with anything you said, defer to your electronic knowledge, and do not personally have enough battery knowledge to have much of an opinion. I deal with a specialist battery store with an owner who has been very helpful and cost effective. FWIW, His opinion is that NiCads will by far outlive (x10-30?) NiMH in terms of total number of recharges, PROVIDED that they are charged by a proper computerized charger which is properly programmed to both fully discharge before charging then control the rate of recharge (high rate (~2hrs) to start followed by low rate (~12hrs) to finish.) He does not like LiIon and considers them hazardous. He regularly replaces the (NiCad & NiMH) cells in computer and other battery packs but will not allow LiIon packs in his store. I think he does sell packaged LiIon batteries. He also had a couple of other reasons (including cost, and others which I forget) which led him to recommend NiCads over NiMH. IIRC, noname NiMH rechargeables were 2-3 times more expensive. He did convince me to buy the proper charger which IIRC was ~$70 but since it will charge both NiCads and NiMH (and LiIon?) I don't think he was motivated by the battery sale and would have sold me either. He also said that in his opinion the best alkaline non-rechargeables available are some very pricy branded ones which he did sell and the Kirkland branded batteries from Costco which were the same but much cheaper. IMHE alkaline battery life is very device dependant. I have a Nikon Coolpix camera which is only able to get a few pictures before reporting low battery but the batteries that will not run the camera will continue to run a flashlight for a very long long time. I have been told that NiMH works better than alkaline or NiCad in this application because they do not reduce output gradually as they are used. I wonder if this is similar in transceiver usage? Happy landings, |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Blue Angels back in Pensacola - practice session - Diamond heading back to the hangar | Pensacola Beachcomber | Aviation Photos | 0 | March 23rd 08 04:28 PM |
Did VHF transceiver need TSO certificate? | [email protected] | Home Built | 13 | March 31st 07 06:27 PM |
FS: Val Com 760 TSO Transceiver | aieo | Aviation Marketplace | 8 | January 25th 07 04:38 PM |
FA: 760ch transceiver | EOC | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 27th 05 08:23 PM |
Transceiver | BoDEAN | Products | 0 | April 7th 04 06:08 AM |