A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Portable/back up transceiver



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 26th 09, 11:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Private
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 188
Default Portable/back up transceiver


"RST Engineering - JIm" wrote in message
m...
NiCads a

a. Horrible for the enviornment (that's the Cad part of NiCad)
b. Have a lousy self-discharge characteristic
c. Are relatively expensive.

NiMH a

a. Not too harmful of Mother Nature
b. Have a fairly decent self-discharge characteristic
c. Are relatively inexpensive (check out thomasdistributing.com)

You may also look into a LiIon pack, depending on which radio you buy.
THey are even better than NiMH.

Jim



I do not disagree with anything you said, defer to your electronic
knowledge, and do not personally have enough battery knowledge to have much
of an opinion. I deal with a specialist battery store with an owner who has
been very helpful and cost effective.

FWIW, His opinion is that NiCads will by far outlive (x10-30?) NiMH in terms
of total number of recharges, PROVIDED that they are charged by a proper
computerized charger which is properly programmed to both fully discharge
before charging then control the rate of recharge (high rate (~2hrs) to
start followed by low rate (~12hrs) to finish.)

He does not like LiIon and considers them hazardous. He regularly replaces
the (NiCad & NiMH) cells in computer and other battery packs but will not
allow LiIon packs in his store. I think he does sell packaged LiIon
batteries.

He also had a couple of other reasons (including cost, and others which I
forget) which led him to recommend NiCads over NiMH. IIRC, noname NiMH
rechargeables were 2-3 times more expensive.

He did convince me to buy the proper charger which IIRC was ~$70 but since
it will charge both NiCads and NiMH (and LiIon?) I don't think he was
motivated by the battery sale and would have sold me either.

He also said that in his opinion the best alkaline non-rechargeables
available are some very pricy branded ones which he did sell and the
Kirkland branded batteries from Costco which were the same but much cheaper.

IMHE alkaline battery life is very device dependant. I have a Nikon Coolpix
camera which is only able to get a few pictures before reporting low battery
but the batteries that will not run the camera will continue to run a
flashlight for a very long long time. I have been told that NiMH works
better than alkaline or NiCad in this application because they do not reduce
output gradually as they are used. I wonder if this is similar in
transceiver usage?

Happy landings,


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Blue Angels back in Pensacola - practice session - Diamond heading back to the hangar Pensacola Beachcomber Aviation Photos 0 March 23rd 08 04:28 PM
Did VHF transceiver need TSO certificate? [email protected] Home Built 13 March 31st 07 06:27 PM
FS: Val Com 760 TSO Transceiver aieo Aviation Marketplace 8 January 25th 07 04:38 PM
FA: 760ch transceiver EOC Aviation Marketplace 0 July 27th 05 08:23 PM
Transceiver BoDEAN Products 0 April 7th 04 06:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.