![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whenever a question arises, it is often best to go back to the source
document. New Sporting Code (valid from October 1 2009, Declaration section: 4.2.1 Declaration content a. Date of flight. b. Name of the pilot-in-command, and the flight crew if any (see Annex C, para 6.3c). c. Glider type, and its registration or serial number or unique NAC-assigned contest number. d. The make, model and serial number of the FR used (as recorded in the igc file for the flight). For any barograph or GPS position recorder used, the make, model and serial number as verified by the OO before flight. Therefore the Competition number assigned by the SSA is perfectly good, and most of this thread is irrelevant.............. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 9:15*am, Peter Purdie wrote:
Whenever a question arises, it is often best to go back to the source document. New Sporting Code (valid from October 1 2009, Declaration section: 4.2.1 Declaration content a. Date of flight. b. Name of the pilot-in-command, and the flight crew if any (see Annex C, para 6.3c). c. Glider type, and its registration or serial number or unique NAC-assigned contest number. d. The make, model and serial number of the FR used (as recorded in the igc file for the flight). For any barograph or GPS position recorder used, the make, model and serial number as verified by the OO before flight. Therefore the Competition number assigned by the SSA is perfectly good, and most of this thread is irrelevant.............. I made that argument, and it was not accepted. -T8 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 9:15*am, Peter Purdie wrote:
Whenever a question arises, it is often best to go back to the source document. New Sporting Code (valid from October 1 2009, Declaration section: 4.2.1 Declaration content a. Date of flight. b. Name of the pilot-in-command, and the flight crew if any (see Annex C, para 6.3c). c. Glider type, and its registration or serial number or unique NAC-assigned contest number. d. The make, model and serial number of the FR used (as recorded in the igc file for the flight). For any barograph or GPS position recorder used, the make, model and serial number as verified by the OO before flight. Therefore the Competition number assigned by the SSA is perfectly good, and most of this thread is irrelevant.............. Hi Peter, Sometimes, it is important to go back and carefully re-read the wording of a rule :-) The catch is that 4.2.1.c refers to a "unique NAC-Assigned contest number." The SSA (and several other large NACs) do not assign a unique contest number to an aircraft; rather, the contest number is assigned to the pilot. In the context of the rule, the interpretation handed down by the IGC is that "unique" refers to the combination of the contest number and aircraft. The IGC folks were very clear that the situation in the US is such that the competition number would not meet the requirements. We tried very hard to explain the impact of this situation, but we ultimately were asked to concede the point. Regards, Erik Mann Chair, SSA FAI Badge & Record Committee |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Papa3" wrote in message ... On Sep 30, 9:15 am, Peter Purdie wrote: Whenever a question arises, it is often best to go back to the source document. New Sporting Code (valid from October 1 2009, Declaration section: 4.2.1 Declaration content a. Date of flight. b. Name of the pilot-in-command, and the flight crew if any (see Annex C, para 6.3c). c. Glider type, and its registration or serial number or unique NAC-assigned contest number. d. The make, model and serial number of the FR used (as recorded in the igc file for the flight). For any barograph or GPS position recorder used, the make, model and serial number as verified by the OO before flight. Therefore the Competition number assigned by the SSA is perfectly good, and most of this thread is irrelevant.............. Hi Peter, Sometimes, it is important to go back and carefully re-read the wording of a rule :-) The catch is that 4.2.1.c refers to a "unique NAC-Assigned contest number." The SSA (and several other large NACs) do not assign a unique contest number to an aircraft; rather, the contest number is assigned to the pilot. In the context of the rule, the interpretation handed down by the IGC is that "unique" refers to the combination of the contest number and aircraft. The IGC folks were very clear that the situation in the US is such that the competition number would not meet the requirements. We tried very hard to explain the impact of this situation, but we ultimately were asked to concede the point. Regards, Erik Mann Chair, SSA FAI Badge & Record Committee Erik; Thanks anyway for the effort. -- Hartley Falbaum USA "KF" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Electronic declaration - Colibri | Ian Cant | Soaring | 2 | September 6th 06 05:55 PM |
Last rites declaration of Ioannes Paulus PP. II (Karol Wojtyla) | Ioannes Paulus PP. II (Karol Wojtyla) | Owning | 0 | April 4th 05 03:57 PM |
Electronic declaration | tango4 | Soaring | 12 | June 24th 04 08:34 AM |
Electronic declaration (for Volkslogger) | stephanevdv | Soaring | 0 | June 23rd 04 11:54 PM |
Help needed with task declaration | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 2 | March 23rd 04 05:43 PM |