![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, JG wrote: On Nov 20, 10:17*pm, Orval Fairbairn wrote: In article , *Jim Logajan wrote: As far as I can tell, the numbers seem to indicate that living near a busy airport is about as dangerous as living near a major highway with respect to ultrafine particle emissions. It seems that demanding that aircraft takeoffs be reduced or shut down entirely at an airport would be equivalent to demanding that the number of vehicles on a major highway be reduced or shut down. The options to neighbors appears to be roughly the same in both cases. Did the study include particulate matter from tire dust that occurs comes from tires rolling down the freeway? That matter would be minimal from an airport but available in quantity from freeways. The whole thing sounds to me like cherry-picked data. Typical of shills to try and change the subject. Subject being inhaled airborne particulates, since when is bringing up another common major source of them "changing the subject"? I support closing SM airport. Of course you do. And any old cudgel will do, whether it makes sense or not. Obsessive much? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
U.S.A.F. - C.A.P. take note from our Canadian neighbors | karen[_2_] | Soaring | 1 | September 28th 09 01:20 AM |
Welding and fumes | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 2 | August 19th 09 04:05 PM |
pick your poison on tow | [email protected] | Soaring | 8 | April 1st 06 07:42 AM |
Cape Cod Airport Neighbors Sign On!!! | Skylune | Piloting | 26 | December 7th 05 05:07 PM |
YF-23 re-emerges for surprise bid | noname | Military Aviation | 8 | July 21st 04 12:40 PM |