![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 15, 12:53*pm, hans wrote:
I fly now for 2 years with a Garrecht ultra compact transponder, and the addition of the transponder, which always on ALT in the air has not significantly changed the number of hours I get out of my batteries. The hx4700 draws much more than the transponder. Am 15.03.2010 04:37, schrieb Steve Koerner: I know that a number of folks have been waiting for hard data on the current consumption of the new Trig transponder in actual operating conditions. I measured the current consumption today on an actual flight of 2 hours 52 minutes. * The flight was in fairly congested airspace all within 10 miles of Turf Soaring school which is located just outside the Phoenix Class B airspace. * In fact, some of the flight was under the class B shelf. * The transponder was continuously on in ALT mode. I noted that it was being interogated at irregular intervals that averaged about once every one or two seconds. I have two batteries on board. *For the test, one battery was powering only the transponder. *I had an Astro Flights watt meter connected to the battery which functions to integrate the current consumption and reports actual Ampere Hours of battery draw. * Total draw for the flight was measured as .353 AH which calculates to 125 mA average over the duration of the flight. Here's a reference to the Astro Flights watt meter for those that might be interested: http://www.astroflight.com/index.php...=index&cPath=2 I'm an EE and I have independently verified the accuracy of my watt meter against a precision lab instrument. Steve Koerner www.wingrigger.com Yes, don't leave out the PDA/PNA, in my glider an HP310 consumes about the same if not more than a Microair Transponder. Brian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 15, 2:00*pm, brianDG303 wrote:
Yes, don't leave out the PDA/PNA, in my glider an HP310 consumes about the same if not more than a Microair Transponder. I'm pretty sure Steve's intention was to report the current drawn by only the TT-21 and not all the other equipment he has in the glider. This infromation is useful to others who may be considering buying the unit. Had he included the ClearNav, PDA, heated socks, etc we would have learned nothing from his post. Andy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trig TT21 Price Increase | Paul Remde | Soaring | 4 | March 5th 10 09:47 PM |
TRIG TT21 Transponders | Tim Mara[_2_] | Soaring | 12 | September 26th 09 02:01 AM |
Trig TT21 Transponder receives FAA TSO approval | Paul Remde | Soaring | 12 | September 19th 09 02:47 PM |
Trig TT21 in Experimental Aircraft | Paul Remde | Soaring | 5 | July 5th 09 03:15 AM |
Trig TT21 Transponder Thoughts? | jcarlyle | Soaring | 16 | June 23rd 09 04:38 PM |