![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 12:34*am, Wingnut wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:13:28 -0700, Dudley Henriques wrote: On Jun 28, 5:39*am, Wingnut wrote: And there goes the Cessna strawman again. When, exactly, did the subject morph from being a commercial pilot to being a private pilot, by the way? Don't know why all the fuss about "Cessna strawmen". :-))))))))))))))))) First of all, the lady in question herself during a televised news interview said quite plainly that her "commercial experience" was limited to light aircraft and Cessna was mentioned. does not say anything like that; it only says she has a commercial pilot's license, with no further detail. Since that is the post that we are debating here, as far as I am concerned everyone bringing up Cessnas is pulling them directly out of their ass. Our givens are solely that she has a commercial pilot's license and was able to successfully assume the copilot's role during the landing of a jumbo jet. Assuming anything beyond that, either negative or positive, seems unwarranted. This "televised news interview" has not been entered into evidence, unlike the content of the original post , so you are assuming facts not in evidence as part of your efforts, in partnership with Mxsmanic, to denigrate me. Assuming facts not in evidence is, of course, an illicit debating move. Secondly, there are literally thousands of pilots certificated as commercial pilots in the United States who have never flown anything more complicated than a light complex. This claim *might* have been more credible had it come from someone who could spell "certified" correctly. In the meantime, the important matter here is not the absolute number but the percentage, about which no claim has yet been made by you. I personally know many of these pilots myself. Personal anecdotes are a notoriously poor substitute for actual evidence. Small, uncontrolled, biased samples are the bane of every statistician. One is a commercial ag operator who has been dusting crops for 30 years and has never flown anything heavier than a 182 Cessna. Aside from the time he flew an FA-18 straight up into the nozzle of an alien superweapon, of course. Sorry, fictional characters make particularly poor evidence. :-) totally flawed in my opinion. Dudley Henriques Yes, your opinion of me is unfortunately quite clear to all, as is the fact that you're the type of person to air such opinions, about people who have done nothing offensive to you to provoke you, in public. You should grow like an onion with your head in the ground. I have no opinion of you at all really. You simply come with Usenet. No problem at all. You have as much right to an opinion here as anyone here. :-)))))))) Dudley Henriques |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pilot nearly crashes in IMC, Controller helps | pimenthal | Piloting | 32 | September 27th 05 01:06 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Toronto Plane Pilot Was Allowed To Land In "Red Alert" Weather | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 24 | August 19th 05 10:48 PM |
2 pilot/small airplane CRM | Mitty | Instrument Flight Rules | 35 | September 1st 04 11:19 PM |
non-pilot lands airplane | Cub Driver | Piloting | 3 | August 14th 04 12:08 AM |
Home Builders are Sick Sick Puppies | pacplyer | Home Built | 11 | March 26th 04 12:39 AM |