Co-pilot gets sick, stewardess helps land airplane

On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:25:12 -0700, Dudley Henriques wrote:

On Jun 29, 5:59Â*am, Wingnut wrote:


Suffice it to say that I am growing weary of these unprovoked attacks
from Mxsmanic and Dudley Henriques. I did nothing to provoke these
relentless and unpleasant criticisms.


Dudley Henriques wrote;

I have no opinion of you at all really. You simply come with Usenet. No
problem at all. You have as much right to an opinion here as anyone
here. :-))))))))
Dudley Henriques

Interesting logic trail you have going here. I admit I'm a bit puzzled
to discover exactly where you are finding all these "relentless and
unpleasant criticisms".

Mainly in Mxsmanic's posts, but you did at least once suggest that I was
a liar, whether you intended to or not.

On Jun 30, 10:35*pm, Wingnut wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:25:12 -0700, Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Jun 29, 5:59*am, Wingnut wrote:

Suffice it to say that I am growing weary of these unprovoked attacks
from Mxsmanic and Dudley Henriques. I did nothing to provoke these
relentless and unpleasant criticisms.

Dudley Henriques wrote;

I have no opinion of you at all really. You simply come with Usenet. No
problem at all. You have as much right to an opinion here as anyone
here. *:-))))))))
Dudley Henriques

Interesting logic trail you have going here. I admit I'm a bit puzzled
to discover exactly where you are finding all these "relentless and
unpleasant criticisms".

Mainly in Mxsmanic's posts, but you did at least once suggest that I was
a liar, whether you intended to or not.

I'd like to see that quote when you get a moment to find it. In all
the years I've been here on this forum I can't recall ever calling or
inferring that someone was a liar.
Dudley Henriques

On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:39:34 -0700, Dudley Henriques wrote:

On Jun 30, 10:35Â*pm, Wingnut wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:25:12 -0700, Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Jun 29, 5:59Â*am, Wingnut wrote:

Suffice it to say that I am growing weary of these unprovoked
attacks from Mxsmanic and Dudley Henriques. I did nothing to provoke
these relentless and unpleasant criticisms.

Dudley Henriques wrote;

I have no opinion of you at all really. You simply come with Usenet.
No problem at all. You have as much right to an opinion here as
anyone here. Â*:-))))))))
Dudley Henriques

Interesting logic trail you have going here. I admit I'm a bit
puzzled to discover exactly where you are finding all these
"relentless and unpleasant criticisms".

Mainly in Mxsmanic's posts, but you did at least once suggest that I
was a liar, whether you intended to or not.

I'd like to see that quote when you get a moment to find it. In all the
years I've been here on this forum I can't recall ever calling or
inferring that someone was a liar.

It was in your post of June 28, at 11:13 am. It was a response to one of
my posts countering one of Mxsmanic's, and it implied (though it didn't
state outright) that I was lying on the topic of how much experience was
implied by a commercial license.

I repeat for the record that at no time have I lied or otherwise acted
dishonestly here.

On Jun 30, 11:37*pm, Wingnut wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:39:34 -0700, Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Jun 30, 10:35*pm, Wingnut wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:25:12 -0700, Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Jun 29, 5:59*am, Wingnut wrote:

Suffice it to say that I am growing weary of these unprovoked
attacks from Mxsmanic and Dudley Henriques. I did nothing to provoke
these relentless and unpleasant criticisms.

Dudley Henriques wrote;

I have no opinion of you at all really. You simply come with Usenet.
No problem at all. You have as much right to an opinion here as
anyone here. *:-))))))))
Dudley Henriques

Interesting logic trail you have going here. I admit I'm a bit
puzzled to discover exactly where you are finding all these
"relentless and unpleasant criticisms".

Mainly in Mxsmanic's posts, but you did at least once suggest that I
was a liar, whether you intended to or not.

I'd like to see that quote when you get a moment to find it. In all the
years I've been here on this forum I can't recall ever calling or
inferring that someone was a liar.

It was in your post of June 28, at 11:13 am. It was a response to one of
my posts countering one of Mxsmanic's, and it implied (though it didn't
state outright) that I was lying on the topic of how much experience was
implied by a commercial license.

I repeat for the record that at no time have I lied or otherwise acted
dishonestly here.

If you have the time of the post and the date of the post, please POST
the post so it can be properly referenced in relation to your charge?
Thank you
Dudley Henriques

On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:55:13 -0700, Dudley Henriques wrote:

On Jun 30, 11:37Â*pm, Wingnut wrote:
I repeat for the record that at no time have I lied or otherwise acted
dishonestly here.

If you have the time of the post and the date of the post, please POST
the post so it can be properly referenced in relation to your charge?

I'm sorry, but I don't feel that YOUR charge against me deserves further
airtime. Repost it yourself if you feel the need but I have no intention
of doing your own dirty work for you. Sorry.

On Jun 30, 11:37*pm, Wingnut wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:39:34 -0700, Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Jun 30, 10:35*pm, Wingnut wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:25:12 -0700, Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Jun 29, 5:59*am, Wingnut wrote:

Suffice it to say that I am growing weary of these unprovoked
attacks from Mxsmanic and Dudley Henriques. I did nothing to provoke
these relentless and unpleasant criticisms.

Dudley Henriques wrote;

I have no opinion of you at all really. You simply come with Usenet.
No problem at all. You have as much right to an opinion here as
anyone here. *:-))))))))
Dudley Henriques

Interesting logic trail you have going here. I admit I'm a bit
puzzled to discover exactly where you are finding all these
"relentless and unpleasant criticisms".

Mainly in Mxsmanic's posts, but you did at least once suggest that I
was a liar, whether you intended to or not.

I'd like to see that quote when you get a moment to find it. In all the
years I've been here on this forum I can't recall ever calling or
inferring that someone was a liar.

It was in your post of June 28, at 11:13 am. It was a response to one of
my posts countering one of Mxsmanic's, and it implied (though it didn't
state outright) that I was lying on the topic of how much experience was
implied by a commercial license.

I repeat for the record that at no time have I lied or otherwise acted
dishonestly here.

I just read the post you have referenced. It shows on my reader as
post #256 in answer to your post referencing "Cessna strawmen".
I'll be completely honest with you Wingnut, I don't believe any
reasonable person reading my response to you will find anything even
remotely coming close to calling you a "liar". I did disagree with
your basic premise about the Cessna reference, and I even went VERY
much out of my way to include not only a smile emoticon for you before
submitting my comment but a LONG smile emoticon to emphasize the non
aggressive nature of my response.

I do realize at this point that you are obviously taking dissenting
comment by others to indicate a personal attack directed at you. I can
only tell you that in my case at least, you are grossly mistaken.
I also believe I've spent enough time dealing with this non-issue, and
suggest we drop it at this point and move on to more productive
discussion.
Dudley Henriques