Co-pilot gets sick, stewardess helps land airplane

On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 08:42:34 +0000 (UTC), Wingnut
wrote:

On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 08:50:32 +0100, JohnT wrote:

"Wingnut" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:30:32 -0700, Hatunen, who had formerly been on
my side, suddenly launched an attack and called me incompetent at best
and a liar at worst.

What gives? You were the most vocal of Mxsmanic's detractors, yet now
suddenly you're taking his side against me. Is he paying you, or
providing some other consideration? Because I doubt you had a genuine,
spontaneous change of heart. Not TO rather than FROM the dark side.
That kind of thing is generally rare and generally only goes in the
other direction.

Then again, maybe you've recently suffered a head injury or something.

All I can say is this is disappointing and unfortunate. Nonetheless it
still leaves Mxsmanic with what, two allies and at least a dozen
detractors? Things are still not looking good for Mxsmanic, no matter
what dishonest tricks he might be using to try to bolster his side and
undermine mine.

What you seem to be saying is that anyone who disagrees with you must be
incompetent or a liar or must have recently suffered a head injury or
something.

No, I'm saying that someone who just suddenly CHANGES sides like that is
PROBABLY either suffering something or has been suborned.

From the looks of things, Hatunen and Mxsmanic have been against one
another for years. Then I come along and, innocently, say:

"Consider who would have been landing the plane if something had caused
the pilot to also conk out, though. Then her prior flight experience
would have become quite relevant indeed."

Again, as I note in another post rsponding to this assertion,
that wasn't the quote in question.

[Lines and lines of diatribe deleted. My, you do carry on.]

--
************* DAVE HATUNEN ) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 09:32:34 -0700, Hatunen wrote:

On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 08:42:34 +0000 (UTC), Wingnut
wrote:
From the looks of things, Hatunen and Mxsmanic have been against one
another for years. Then I come along and, innocently, say:

"Consider who would have been landing the plane if something had caused
the pilot to also conk out, though. Then her prior flight experience
would have become quite relevant indeed."

Again, as I note in another post rsponding to this assertion, that
wasn't the quote in question.

Of course it was. That was what I said (and ALL I said, aside from quoted
text, attribution, and headers) in the post that Mxsmanic originally
attacked and that started this whole ball rolling.

Anyone who is unsure can use Google Groups to verify the truth of the
above statement.