![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy:
I agree. It should be a "Flarm compatible device" that is mandated for 2011 contests not PowerFlarm per se. I don't understand the nit picking about rights holders vs manufacturers. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 20, 12:44*pm, Steve Koerner wrote:
I don't understand the nit picking about rights holders vs manufacturers. It's a question of what flexibility a manufacturer has to modify the core technology/firmware to make it compatible with new features that are not supported by other FLARM products. The new features need to be integrated not just stuffed in the same box. If, as Darrly says, the holder of the rights and the manufacturer are working together on PowerFLARM then I agree it should be a non issue. Andy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trig TT21 transponder draws only 125 mA! | Steve Koerner | Soaring | 5 | March 15th 10 09:59 PM |
TRIG TT21 Transponders | Tim Mara[_2_] | Soaring | 12 | September 26th 09 02:01 AM |
Trig TT21 Transponder receives FAA TSO approval | Paul Remde | Soaring | 12 | September 19th 09 02:47 PM |
Trig TT21 in Experimental Aircraft | Paul Remde | Soaring | 5 | July 5th 09 03:15 AM |
Trig TT21 Transponder Thoughts? | jcarlyle | Soaring | 16 | June 23rd 09 04:38 PM |