![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 24, 8:35*am, John Cochrane
wrote: Please adopt the FAI rules and stop wasting everyone's time with inventing new ones! * Use any surplus energy to participate in refining the FAI rules if changes are needed. Andy Have you actually read the FAI rules? I have, and flown under them, and I think adopting them for US contests would be a terrible idea. Start with frequent mass landouts. If we basically say that everybody needs a crew to fly in a contest, that alone will cut participation in half. At least half of our pilots show up crewless. The FAI has known for over 20 years that its day devaluation formulas lead to dangerous and unpleasant mass gaggling start roulette and leeching, yet does nothing about it. Then there are little gems like a start with an altitude limit but no time or speed limit. Pilots diving at VNE out of clouds. At WGC Szeged we saw what happens with a finish line set 1 cm over a barbed wire fence at the airport perimeter -- crash into a truck on the airport road. We got rid of that nonsense a long time ago by moving the finish up. And on and on. Yes, adopting FAI rules would better train our US teams -- we were at a real disadvantage from not having much practice with them. It would also mean nobody but the team shows up for contests! John Cochrane I have not flown under the FAI rules but I did study them when I was following this year's WGC. All you objections are valid I'm sure, hence the second part of my proposal "Use any surplus energy to participate in refining the FAI rules if changes are needed." Surely mass landouts as much a function of the task setting as the rules. Also nothing to say that US contests could not have exceptions to FAI rules where is was appropriate. E.g. It would seem quite easy to use the same tasking and scoring rules but with a modified finish altitude. The fact that the FAI rules are not perfect does not seem to justify having a completely separate set of rules. Andy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SSA Contest Rules Committee Election and Poll Results (USA) | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 1 | October 14th 08 02:11 AM |
US SSA/SRA Contest Rules Poll | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 18 | November 4th 07 05:59 PM |
USA - 2005 SRA Pilot Opinion Poll Results Posted | Ken Kochanski (KK) | Soaring | 0 | December 1st 05 12:33 PM |
2005 SSA Contest Rules Poll and Election | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | September 27th 05 01:47 PM |
500 foot rule and pilot opinion poll | John Cochrane | Soaring | 84 | October 2nd 03 02:13 PM |