![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Marron" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote: "Ed Rasimus" wrote: Would you mean F-100F Weasel, F-105F Weasel, F-105G Weasel, F-4C Weasel or F-4G Weasel??? I've flown next to four of those five (in combat) and will testify that none of them have any particular advantage for going fast. In fact, the Weasel conversions for all five aircraft add bumps and blisters for antennae that increase drag. Yes, an F-105 is fast and I will testify that the airplane is capable of supersonic flight at extreme low altitude, but I'd opt for single-seat D model to really go fast and not a wart-encrusted two-seater. The F-4G Weasel, of course was LES. I mean an F-15 in ground effect that fast would be a bad thing. First, what you just wrote has nothing to do with what Ed just said. In that case, why is Ed's response to me? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:
"Mike Marron" wrote: "Ed Rasimus" wrote: Would you mean F-100F Weasel, F-105F Weasel, F-105G Weasel, F-4C Weasel or F-4G Weasel??? I've flown next to four of those five (in combat) and will testify that none of them have any particular advantage for going fast. In fact, the Weasel conversions for all five aircraft add bumps and blisters for antennae that increase drag. Yes, an F-105 is fast and I will testify that the airplane is capable of supersonic flight at extreme low altitude, but I'd opt for single-seat D model to really go fast and not a wart-encrusted two-seater. The F-4G Weasel, of course was LES. I mean an F-15 in ground effect that fast would be a bad thing. First, what you just wrote has nothing to do with what Ed just said. In that case, why is Ed's response to me? Don't look now, but Ed hasn't yet responded to your most recent nonsense about an "F-15 in ground effect is a bad thing." Now, lemme say this one more time so please try and follow along and just forget about Ed for the time being, OK? I'm sure he's probably wondering what you meant as well and will be jumping in here shortly. Once again, you said an "F-15 is ground effect going fast would be a bad thing." Do you even know what "ground effect" is? An F-15, or F-4, -105 or any fast jet doesn't ingress and egress from the target area in "ground effect." Sure, they fly low, but not THAT low! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tail flapper failure | Veeduber | Home Built | 2 | May 22nd 04 06:52 AM |
twin tail questions | Kevin Horton | Home Built | 12 | January 2nd 04 03:21 PM |
T Tail question | Paul Austin | Military Aviation | 7 | September 23rd 03 06:05 PM |
The prone postion for tail gunners versus turrets. | The Enlightenment | Military Aviation | 8 | July 22nd 03 11:01 PM |
The Tail Gunner Said It: 'I Love Them People' | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 1 | July 7th 03 11:37 PM |