Reprofiling LS6 wings

On Jun 21, 1:01*pm, Grider Pirate wrote:
On Jun 21, 11:54*am, jsbrake wrote:





Okay, I think need to be an idiot and ask the questions (I beg your
indulgence)...

I understand the part about getting the correct profile templates and
shaping the wing to the correct profile. *However, doesn't that mean
that the wing will be thicker than profile once the gelcoat is sprayed
on? *Or are the templates made deliberately thinner to account for
this added thickness? *But then how would one know how thick to lay on
the gelcoat?

It seems to me that "re-finish" and "re-profile" are being used nearly
interchangeably, i.e. in both cases, the gelcoat is completely
removed.

Can it be that the gelcoat can be only partially sanded off, filled in
somehow (more gel?) to meet profile, then bond in another layer of
gelcoat? *I've seen a wing repaired: new foam core, glass layers,
bondo then gelcoat, so I know small patches can be done this way (I
didn't get to see the gelcoat being applied).

Thanks!
-John
(and if these are _really_ stupid questions, just call me Hugo)
(no offense intended to anyone named Hugo)

The best step-by-step I've ever found was on Jimphoenix.com. *He
stripped, reprofiled, and refinished a set of Nimbus wings.
Unfortunately, I don't think it's still available, as he has moved to
Washington and is now more into boats. *It might not hurt to email him
to see if he could send you the 'article'.
Cheers- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh wait! Here it is.....http://www.jimphoenix.com/nimbus/

Before I make myself out to be too much of an idiot with a mostly-
likely-obvious question... is there a quick quide on the process of re-
profiling? *

Quick and reprofiling don't belong in the same sentence. Not sure why
it hasn't been linked yet, but here you go:

http://www.8kcab.com/Checklists_file...0_Refinish.pdf

It should at least give you an idea of what you're (thinking about)
getting into...

-p

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:09:20 -0700 (PDT), mattm
wrote:

My plane seems to fly about 10-12% worse than the Johnson
measured polar. The gelcoat is in pretty good shape overall
after 33 years though; it looks like a reprofiling is basically
a refinish project, which I'm not planning on doing anytime soon.


Hi Matt,

don't rely too much on Johnson's polars. Dick did an amazing job, but
with his limited resources his polars are off more often than not.

The German Idaflieg polars are usually very precise, but it took ten
times more effort to measure them.

My advice:
Take a close look at the wing and try to find out if there's waviness
in front of the wing spar. The best way is to have a neon lamp over
the wing - by looking at its reflection you can see the slightest
waviness.
If you find serious waviness (which I doubt), come back to this group
and ask for an exchange between help and cash.
If you don't ... be happy and ignore Dick's polar.

In my opinion it is impossible to get a proper airfoil again if you
don't have some experienced guy at hand.


Andreas

p.s.
Do you happen to have a friend with a similar glider (ASW-20, Ventus
1) at hand that you could use to compare your performance to?