![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 02:27:57 GMT, "Thomas Schoene"
wrote: Les Matheson wrote: (boy, top-posting is a pain) Because they are going to use the same airframe, I'm pretty sure of that. Perhaps. If so, there's no reason the AC and MC replacement scould not use different fuselage lengths. All the important systems are common. OTOH, they might decide not to use the same airframe if they adopt an exotic design for an MC-103 replacement (quad tiltrotor, tilt-wing, etc). Something to add to the mix - the USAF is testing the launching of Viper Strike (BAT with an additional laser seeker) from C-130s, with a view to replacing the 105mm on the AC-130 fleet. The idea being a 105mm round is about the same size, so you get more stored kills without the single point of failure of the gun itself. Peter Kemp |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AC-130 Replacement Contemplated | sid | Military Aviation | 29 | February 10th 04 10:15 PM |
Magneto/comm interference on TKM MX-R Narco 120 replacement | Eugene Wendland | Home Built | 5 | January 13th 04 02:17 PM |
Canada to order replacement for the Sea King | Ed Majden | Military Aviation | 3 | December 18th 03 07:02 PM |
Replacement for C130? | John Penta | Military Aviation | 24 | September 29th 03 07:11 PM |
Hellfire Replacement | Eric Moore | Military Aviation | 6 | July 2nd 03 02:22 AM |