![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 15, 12:50*pm, Bob Kuykendall wrote:
On May 15, 12:35*am, Ramy wrote: Checked the rudder cables on my 27 - looking good. But as JJ described, loosening the tension on one side causes a hard over to the other side! I do not necessarily agree with JJ's synopsis of the situation. Yes, on the ground removing the tension of one spring will cause the rudder to go to the opposite stop. However, in the air there is airflow over the rudder that would counteract the force of the spring. How much effect this has depends on the strength of the return spring as well as other aerodynamic factors. In all of the sailplanes I've flown, the rudder springs are pretty wimpy in relation to the aerodynamic forces involved. 14CFR23 and JAR22 dictate that the rudder circuit of light aircraft is to be designed to react at least 150 lbs per pedal and a combined force of 300 lbs on the pedal pair unless a lower force can be rationally justified. On that basis, it is my conjecture that there is an additional factor at work in the JS1 incident besides a broken rudder cable. I am standing by to see if such a factor comes to light. I would like to hear how glider manufactures defends this design! As a glider designer, I defend it so: Cable actuation systems are a simple and effective approach to the set of problems at hand. They are easy to inspect and service, and problems are easy to detect. The 1/8" (3mm) cables commonly used have about a 4x safety factor over typical maximum control forces, so they will take a lot of abuse before failing. Every experienced A&P and IA knows to inspect cables in their areas of tightest curvature, and these inspections bring to light the vast majority of potential problems long before they become critical. As typically implemented in sailplane fuselages (including the three I have so far built), the cable-in-tunnel system has the additionally compelling advantage of adding increased rudder damping when the pilot applies pressure to both pedals. This feature has been successfully used to damp incidents of rudder flutter in quite a number of incidents that might otherwise have eventually resulted in resonant failure of the aft fuselage. The one issue I have with typical sailplane rudder cable systems is that the S-tube on the side of the pedal that allows for pedal position adjustment can cause a short-radius curvature of the rudder cable at extremes of pedal deflection. The improvement I will try to make in my next set of rudder pedals is to try to add an exit radius to the ends of the S-tubes so that they look like tiny trumpet bells in side view. This will increase the radius of curvature in the cable, and hopefully decrease the wear and fatigue in the cable at that point. As a counterexample rudder actuation system, I submit the Diamant. The makers went to heroics to reduce rudder actuation friction, using push- pull tubes in linear roller bearings with many ball bearing pivots and a rather complicated pedal adjustment system. What they got was rudder flutter, and they ended up having to incorporate a hydraulic shock absorber in order to apply damping to the system. So they started with a complicated system and ended up having to make it more complicated yet before it was fully functional. Think of all the things they could have done with their energy had they just used a standard cable system and moved on. *I wonder how many were killed by this design, giving many unexplained spins into the ground from higher altitude. My guess is few to none. Here in the US, crash investigations of light aircraft, especially those of gliders, do tend to be less systematic than those of larger aircraft. However, in my experience crash investigators are fully competent at recognizing the signatures of wear and fatigue failures in cable-actuated control systems. Where such signatures are found, they are usually announced prominently in the accident synopsis. Thanks, Bob K. "The improvement I will try to make in my next set of rudder pedals is to try to add an exit radius to the ends of the S-tubes so that they look like tiny trumpet bells in side view. This will increase the radius of curvature in the cable, and hopefully decrease the wear and fatigue in the cable at that point. " Apparently this is the solution SH used on at least some of their sailplanes. Upon recent inspection on my Mini Nimbus there is no wear after many years. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Russian defense minister Sergei Ivanov confirms the sale of modern TOR-M1 anti-aircraft missile systems to Iran | AirRaid | Naval Aviation | 1 | January 16th 07 05:06 PM |
Rudder cable slots | Ernest Christley | Home Built | 5 | July 1st 06 04:29 AM |
Can anyone help, PLEASE - searching for zip-cord (aka: mono-cord, speaker wire, shooting wire, dbl hookup, rainbow cable, ribbon cable) | Striker Cat | General Aviation | 0 | October 12th 04 05:11 PM |
rudder cable question | Bob Loer | Home Built | 7 | November 26th 03 08:34 AM |
Rudder cable - was The Little Wheel in Back | BD5ER | Home Built | 9 | September 11th 03 04:14 PM |