|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
April 7th 13, 04:36 PM
posted to rec.aviation.soaring
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFlarm: 2.7 Vertical Range
On Saturday, April 6, 2013 5:32:49 PM UTC-4, FLARM wrote:
Previously the ability to show traffic beyond 500m vertical was a undocumented, unreliable ‘bug’ which could have caused problems with other functions, which is why we removed it. I'm very happy that FLARM is getting around to removing "features" that are in fact bugs. Thanks for the emphasis on reliability and correctness. This bodes well. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PowerFlarm Range Analysis | Richard[_9_] | Soaring | 0 | March 25th 13 04:43 PM |
| PowerFLARM Range Issues - Part Two with info from todays flights | Mark | Soaring | 34 | October 20th 12 08:21 PM |
| PowerFlarm BRICK range issues - are we alone???? | Mark | Soaring | 79 | October 17th 12 12:17 PM |
| PowerFLarm expected range | [email protected] | Soaring | 6 | August 30th 12 03:43 PM |
| long range aircraft flying short-range routes? | tupolev204 | Piloting | 10 | April 22nd 11 07:44 PM |
Hybrid Mode
