![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 12:39 15 November 2013, GM wrote:
... The angle of attack of the glider during a winch launch is no different than if the glider was in free flight at the same speed! Actually, it is significantly different: the wing has to deal with the tension in the cable (including the cable self-weight) as well as supporting the weight of the glider. This could easily double the AoA required in steady flight & smoth conditions towards the end of a winch launch. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, November 15, 2013 7:41:22 AM UTC-6, James Metcalfe wrote:
At 12:39 15 November 2013, GM wrote: ... The angle of attack of the glider during a winch launch is no different than if the glider was in free flight at the same speed! Actually, it is significantly different: the wing has to deal with the tension in the cable (including the cable self-weight) as well as supporting the weight of the glider. This could easily double the AoA required in steady flight & smoth conditions towards the end of a winch launch. Well, James, now you have gone and confused AoA with lift coefficient. You do not necessarily double AOA to double lift coefficient. Lift coefficient generally goes up about. 1 per degree of AoA while you are below separation of flow on the wing surface. At some point on the curve, doubling AoA doubles Cl, but only at that one point. And I would guess that point is no where near where you operate on a winch launch. Steve |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 16:02 15 November 2013, Steve Leonard wrote:
Well, James, now you have gone and confused AoA with lift coefficient. You do not necessarily double AOA to double lift coefficient. Lift coefficient generally goes up about. 1 per degree of AoA while you are below separation of flow on the wing surface. At some point on the curve, doubling AoA doubles Cl, but only at that one point. And I would guess that point is no where near where you operate on a winch launch. No confusion in my mind ... when I mentioned doubling I was just pointing out that the difference was substantial. I could have been less conservative and said 'tripled' or 'quadrupled'! If you look at a typical graph of lift coefficient vs AoA you will see that to double the lift you can expect to much more than double the AoA. (Although the curve is substantially linear for most of the AoA range, it doesn't pass through the origin). Not that I said anything at all about doubling the lift! J. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, November 16, 2013 12:42:24 AM UTC+1, James Metcalfe wrote:
At 16:02 15 November 2013, Steve Leonard wrote: Well, James, now you have gone and confused AoA with lift coefficient. You do not necessarily double AOA to double lift coefficient. Lift coefficient generally goes up about. 1 per degree of AoA while you are below separation of flow on the wing surface. At some point on the curve, doubling AoA doubles Cl, but only at that one point. And I would guess that point is no where near where you operate on a winch launch. No confusion in my mind ... when I mentioned doubling I was just pointing out that the difference was substantial. I could have been less conservative and said 'tripled' or 'quadrupled'! If you look at a typical graph of lift coefficient vs AoA you will see that to double the lift you can expect to much more than double the AoA. (Although the curve is substantially linear for most of the AoA range, it doesn't pass through the origin). Not that I said anything at all about doubling the lift! J. James, Steve not wanting to hi-jack this thread but let me re-state what I meant to say more precisely: the AoA during the winch launch is no where near the the stall AoA. We did fly several winch launches with a side-string attached on the outside of the canopy. Since the line pull forces during the steepest part of the climb are nowhere near the forces shortly before the release and since we are using Spectra, which weighs a few pounds for the 4,500ft we can lay out, the loading on the glider is well below 2g. So the AoA should be that of a glider loaded at 1.5 - 2g. Uli |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
long range aircraft flying short-range routes? | tupolev204 | Piloting | 10 | April 22nd 11 07:44 PM |
FAA Administrator and FAA on the ropes and going broke | PapaFoxTrot | Piloting | 0 | September 16th 08 03:33 PM |
Charging system failure cuts short a long X-Country | Ron Lee[_2_] | Piloting | 10 | November 15th 07 11:04 PM |
Tow Ropes | [email protected] | Soaring | 6 | July 15th 05 07:39 PM |
Plasma Ropes ----- Help | Dave Martin | Soaring | 7 | September 30th 03 11:23 PM |