![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 11:30:47 AM UTC-6, Andy Blackburn wrote:
I agree with your geometric assessment Steve. I'd rather not have a MAT with no steering turn to a gate finish. Not sure if that's what you were arguing for. The 10 mile steering point may be too close to get a good altitude spread however. 9B I am not arguing for a MAT with a gate finish. If you use a MAT, for goodness sake just use a finish cylinder and keep it high enough and in close enough so there is time to sort out who lands first. Pretty sure we agree on this. However, if I am forced to pick between two evils, I would rather have a MAT with a finish line and set direction, let the pilot choose if he wants to use a last turn that requires a gate hook or not than have a MAT with a mandatory last turn that is within 10 miles of the finish (as would be required for a steering turn under the present rules). Why? If I am setting myself up for a hook the end of the gate finish, I personally will add another 2-300 feet to my finish energy to be able to make the turn. I won't do it on the deck. I will be outside the area of the opposite direction traffic and probably above what they will get on their pull up when we might pass. And my eyes will be in the direction they will be coming from. I won't likely pick a final turnpoint that requires the gate hook, either. I would rather not have the chance of driving to a point and then heading home with someone driving for that same point, opposite my heading, at my altitude (I tend to fly final glides with more margin than most). But just to be doubly clear. If I am flying a MAT, I want a finish cylinder, not a gate finish. I am of the opinion that a final turnpoint in very close is something that should be avoided whenever possible, with the US finish rules. The lesson learned from that terrible accident at Uvalde is to not do a near 180 degree course reversal close to home (even 20 miles out), as the altitude difference inbound to outbound and fat to squeaking is so little that you will almost assure near head on passes at minimal altitude separation. And it has been interesting to watch as a Task Advisor how this can be applied in the middle of a task to the point where the CD is on some days afraid to have a large direction reversal even with a large turn area. And other days, it never seems to enter his mind. Human Nature, I guess. Steve Leonard |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
FWIW - I am very new to contest flying and have little expertise - so I am confident I can give you the view from a newbie/non competitive older guy.
I flock to any thing that allows people on the ground (primarily my wife) to watch where I am - if something new allows (my crew (my wife)) to see how high I am , I load that - if it shows more - I load that app - all in an attempt to bring the people who care about me and give me the space/time to fly, to feel more apart of my experience and stay engaged in the sport. Tracking is a good thing ![]() I also use the Financially Efficient means of navigation (XCSOAR/Top Hat) on a tablet and backed up by my smart phone. I carry spare batteries and have them hooked to their own external batteries, so they work without a drain on the glider batteries. I feel it is impossible to stop tech gadgets in the cockpit - hopefully pilots use them wisely and they add to safety, rather than become a huge distraction. (same can be said for FLARM displays, I think) I would not want to be the CD who has to figure our which dive can do what - I am pretty sure we all would have a problem knowing what apps are on any device and what they do, how they are disabled and how hard it is to enable and disable them on the fly. VFR has pretty clear definition - and if you cheat, you know it and probably everyone else does to. So you may win a few but you don't make friends and you do not share the experience, so........ i would not worry about tech stuff in the cockpit other than the poor instructors who have to ensure their student keep their eyes where they belong - looking out the canopy. WH1 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New US Competition Rules Committee Documents Posted on SSA Website | John Godfrey (QT)[_2_] | Soaring | 2 | December 16th 11 05:33 PM |
USA 2010 Competition Rules Committee Minutes Posted | John Godfrey (QT)[_2_] | Soaring | 43 | December 23rd 10 02:33 AM |
SSA Competition Rules Meeting Minutes | [email protected] | Soaring | 3 | December 4th 09 08:04 PM |
2008 SSA Contest Rules Meeting Minutes | [email protected] | Soaring | 12 | December 14th 08 08:52 PM |
2005 SSA Rules Committee Meeting Minutes Posted | Ken Kochanski (KK) | Soaring | 1 | December 20th 05 05:38 PM |