![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt,
I'm mainly arguing for ATs in pure classes or US Club Class (a significant portion of the reason they wanted to break from Sports class). In the case of significant handicap range (or advanced to beginner pilots), absolutely, TATs and even one turn MATs are reasonbly tasks designed to provide a means for those classes to compete. Absolutely ATs would not work. Long MATs however could work. In a perfect world remember we would all compete in the exact same gliders with exactly the same wingloading and equipment! This would isolate the pilot as the key variable. Handicap classes are an effort to fix the problem of gliders of varying performance and therefore not ideal/perfect forms of competition. The more variables introduced into a competition (different gliders, complex tasks, complex rules) the less ideal the competition is. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Proposal for the group | Dudley Henriques[_2_] | Piloting | 29 | November 20th 08 07:31 PM |
Marriage Proposal via ATC | FLAV8R | Piloting | 9 | October 27th 06 02:18 AM |
A serious proposal | john smith | Piloting | 7 | November 27th 05 06:46 PM |
[igc-discuss] To change or not to change... rules ? | Denis | Soaring | 0 | February 16th 05 07:24 PM |
Proposal: use OT (off topic) | Scott Moore | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | November 14th 04 09:47 PM |