ASG-29E vs. JS-1Jet Sustainer

Thanks for the info, very informative.

Regards Ben

On Thursday, 29 January 2015 14:19:14 UTC+10, JS wrote:
Ben, the LS6A was always a favorite glider of mine, had one for 12 years. But after flying ASW27 the LS6 felt claustrophobic. A mod to the seat back somewhat fixed that. The JS1 is not quite as large a cockpit as the ASH26, even though from the outside the fuselages appear the same. But both JS1 and ASW27/28/29 fuselage should feel spacious after flying the 6. The LS6C seat back apparently stolen from LS8 makes that cockpit feel larger too.
If your shoes are wide, ASW27/28/29 rudder pedals may require you to narrow the soles of your shoes (I use a die grinder) to fit between the cable guides and the tabs on the inside of the pedals. I don't remember doing this in the 26 or JS1, but that may have been choice of footwear at the time.
With the 29 I fly middle seatback position at the bottom, I have raised the adjustment cross-tube 1 hole on 27 and 29 so the seat tilts further back.. It's necessary to grind a bit out of the right side flange of the seat back to accommodate the Oxygen regulator if you do this. My pedals are not in full forward position. I'm 6'0" (1.83m) tall and about 173Lbs (78.5kg). As they say, your mileage may vary.
The JS1 seat back is not adjustable in flight. Nor are some of the 29s I've seen.
Regarding Oxygen, the JS1 uses a smaller O2 cylinder than anything else I've run into. There's a mod to put a second cylinder in the fuselage, but that will not work if you have the jet sustainer.
Forgot to mention in the previous post, the JS1 has a couple of W+B related items that are notable.
There is a second 5 liter tail tank which cannot be dumped in flight, so you can adjust the CG to your preference and it won't change when you dump the water ballast you've correctly loaded using the fantastic spreadsheet Jonker Sailplanes provides. This is particularly useful for a partnership or syndicate.
Jim


On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at 5:59:28 PM UTC-8, Ben Coleman wrote:
On Thursday, 29 January 2015 09:01:42 UTC+10, JS wrote:
Comments from 40 hours or so in JS1B and C, more in the 29, and even more in a 26E:


Jim, how do cockpit sizes compare bewteen the 26E, 29 and JS1? I am a wide body model and just about have to lube up to get in my LS6 - if I'm dreaming of a new ship I may as well dream about one that fits.

Thanks Ben

Of course you could also get your order in for the new Ventus 3?

At 09:01 29 January 2015, Jack Russell wrote:
Of course you could also get your order in for the new Ventus 3?

What is known about the Ventus 3? 15/18 or 18/21m? Anything
else?

John Galloway

Vaporware to slow down the sale of 29s and JS1s ;-)

Just like the Duckhawk and the JS1 prove, it will be a miracle if Shempp Hirth is able to produce a significant performance increase over the 29. Hype is a curious, highly predictable thing. The JS1 in 18 and the Duckhawk in 15 are very good gliders but they fell far short of being the game changers they were innitially advertised as being. The other gliders are still very much competitive. In fact the 29 has never lost the World Championship I believe. Now here comes the rumored V3 and many are touting it to be a "game changer!" Fact is that the 29 is "still" the standard by which all other 18m gliders are measured. It is going to be exceedingly difficult (and expensive) to significantly exceed it.

Furthermore, if a clearly superior 18 meter glider arrives, the 18m class (long strong due to perceived stability) will fracture a bit. Many will just stop competing in an uneven event rather than buy a new glider.

Once something new arrives which has a clear advantage, maybe I'll get in line :-). But I'm not that worried about it. It might be appealing just to start a "legacy" 18 meter class and exclude the V3. I like racing (well, OLCing) 29s and JS1s just fine.

At 14:46 29 January 2015, Sean Fidler wrote:
Vaporware to slow down the sale of 29s and JS1s ;-)

Just like the Duckhawk and the JS1 prove, it will be a miracle if Shempp
Hi=
rth is able to produce a significant performance increase over the 29.
Hyp=
e is a curious, highly predictable thing. The JS1 in 18 and the Duckhawk
i=
n 15 are very good gliders but they fell far short of being the game
change=
rs they were innitially advertised as being. The other gliders are still
v=
ery much competitive. In fact the 29 has never lost the World
Championship=
I believe. Now here comes the rumored V3 and many are touting it to
be a
=
"game changer!" Fact is that the 29 is "still" the standard by which all
o=
ther 18m gliders are measured. It is going to be exceedingly difficult
(an=
d expensive) to significantly exceed it.

Furthermore, if a clearly superior 18 meter glider arrives, the 18m class
(=
long strong due to perceived stability) will fracture a bit. Many will
jus=
t stop competing in an uneven event rather than buy a new glider.

Once something new arrives which has a clear advantage, maybe I'll get
in
l=
ine :-). But I'm not that worried about it. It might be appealing just
to=
start a "legacy" 18 meter class and exclude the V3. I like racing (well,
O=
LCing) 29s and JS1s just fine.



I merely suggested it as an option. We shall see what the future will
bring.

The V3 is vaporware? Well that saves me wondering about going to
Aero 2015 for the launch (as mentioned in the latest S&G).

As an aside, I think the Duckhawk (and the Diana) will be seen as
game changers in the long term by showing the potential for gliders
if they can be built by advanced construction methods allowing for
very low weights, high aspect ratios and wide wing loading ranges -
provided they manage to get EASA (and US equivalent) certified.

John Galloway



At 14:46 29 January 2015, Sean Fidler wrote:
Vaporware to slow down the sale of 29s and JS1s ;-)

Just like the Duckhawk and the JS1 prove, it will be a miracle if
Shempp
Hi=
rth is able to produce a significant performance increase over the
29.
Hyp=
e is a curious, highly predictable thing. The JS1 in 18 and the
Duckhawk
i=
n 15 are very good gliders but they fell far short of being the game
change=
rs they were innitially advertised as being. The other gliders are
still
v=
ery much competitive. In fact the 29 has never lost the World
Championship=
I believe. Now here comes the rumored V3 and many are touting
it to be a
=
"game changer!" Fact is that the 29 is "still" the standard by
which all
o=
ther 18m gliders are measured. It is going to be exceedingly
difficult
(an=
d expensive) to significantly exceed it.

Furthermore, if a clearly superior 18 meter glider arrives, the 18m
class
(=
long strong due to perceived stability) will fracture a bit. Many will
jus=
t stop competing in an uneven event rather than buy a new glider.

Once something new arrives which has a clear advantage, maybe
I'll get in
l=
ine :-). But I'm not that worried about it. It might be appealing
just
to=
start a "legacy" 18 meter class and exclude the V3. I like racing
(well,
O=
LCing) 29s and JS1s just fine.

Its Vaporware until it wins a few worlds. And Hype!

I agree PrePreg is the what is needed.

I remember a post some time back that began with the proclamation "since the Ventus 2 is no longer competitive" then shortly thereafter at the USA 18 meter Nations everyone got their butt kicked by two Ventus 2s....Sorry, I couldn't resist ;-)

Two words: Doug Jacobs
Two mo Rick Walters
They would probably have been 1-2 if their wings were clipped.
Doug is Doug and Rick is extroidinarily good as well as a master of Minden wave. It was a pleasure to watch.
The Discus 2 is clearly a great glider. I'm not sure why it does not seem to be quite equal (or as popular) at the World level. And here comes the V3!