Towpilots ignoring turn signals

On Saturday, May 2, 2015 at 6:22:18 AM UTC+3, 6PK wrote:
On Friday, May 1, 2015 at 7:43:32 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 9:14:53 AM UTC-6, Dan Marotta wrote:
Don,



This discussion is mainly by and for US pilots.* In the US, steering
the tug is acceptable practice and is taught during training.* It is
not dangerous as you suggest because it's common practice.



In the US, my experience regarding ground launch has typically been
that most folks consider it dangerous.* I find it quite enjoyable
and cost effective compared to air tow.



I understand that, in Australia, it is MANDATORY to fly in high tow
position.* That makes me very uncomfortable when I'm flying the tug.



In Britain, they do a lot of cloud flying.* You've already read in
recent threads that US pilots (me excluded) think that's crazy and
dangerous.



So I ask you:* What's dangerous?* Is it what you think is dangerous
based upon your experience and under common practices where you fly,
or is it what is out of the ordinary for the region in question?* I
think the latter choice is more appropriate.




On 4/30/2015 7:28 AM, Don Johnstone
wrote:



At 13:13 30 April 2015, Bob Pasker wrote:



ok, go back and read my origina message. the tow pilot that towed me said
h=
e ignored my signals because glider pilots don't know how to fly on tow,
no=
t because he was taking me to an area of lift, which I admit would have
bee=
n a great answer if he had (not you) had made it.


OK let us look at this sensibly. For a glider pilot on tow to move his
glider in an attempt to steer the tug is just plain crazy, only a complete
idiot would attempt it. In over 50 years of gliding this is the first time
I have ever heard anyone suggest the procedure.
The duty of a glider pilot is to remain, as far as possible, in the correct
position behind the tug. The glider goes where the tug takes him and if you
have no radio contact there is NO safe way of telling him where you want to
go. An out of position glider is putting the combination at risk. While it
is acceptable to demonstrate out of position, for training purposes, it is
essential that the tug pilot is briefed, and agrees before hand.
If you got any more crazy ideas please keep them to yourself. Someone with
limited knowledge might just read your crazy idea and try it out.






--

Dan Marotta

I question whether it is wise to intentionally inhibit the towpilot's ability to turn in one direction by pulling on it's tail. What will the towpilot do if you are pulling the tail left and he needs to turn left for traffic? Is it worth losing a rope? or having the rope wrap around your wing when the towpilot is forced to release? or have the towpilot or you run get in a mid-air?

There are many things that have been changed in gliding manuals over the years. You're allowed to make changes as you gain experience.

snip ;""I question whether it is wise to intentionally inhibit the towpilot's ability to turn in one direction by pulling on it's tail""
By moving the glider to wingtip position would hardly inhibit the tow pilot's ability to turn or maneuver. Yes, it should get his attention that the glider is out to the side, nothing more and nothing less. And yes; I would like to emphasize that this maneuver is not meant to be "yanking" or anything abrupt (as some previous authors implied).
It is no different, the matter affect very much the same as moving out to one side kind like boxing the wake. And I'm sure no one is suggesting "yanking the wake".
6PK

If it is merely a signal to the towpilot that has little to no actual effect on the towplane and it's up to the tow pilot to take the hint or not, then that is one thing. If it is physically pulled the towplane's tail around then that is quite another!

When I'm giving introductory lessons, manoeuvring out to one tip of the towplane's wing for a few seconds is something I do routinely, to illustrate my spoken point that I am actively flying the glider, not passively following the tug. I certainly don't want the tug to turn as a result!

On Saturday, May 2, 2015 at 7:46:38 AM UTC-4, Bruce Hoult wrote:

If it is merely a signal to the towpilot that has little to no actual effect on the towplane and it's up to the tow pilot to take the hint or not, then that is one thing. If it is physically pulled the towplane's tail around then that is quite another!

That seems to sugar coat what happens sometimes... To paraphrase my excellent and expert CFI-G... 'You really have to pull on the tug's tail and point him in the direction that you want to go.' And so, on more than one occasion, I've given much more than a subtle signal and I've not yet gotten a complaint from a tug pilot.

That said, I will going forward, use the radio in lieu of tail pulling. Maintaining optimal position behind the tug might provide a slightly better margin, especially on a gusty day, and especially if a tug pilot might react by releasing me at low altitude.

I still think that 'boxing the wake' (with the tug pilot's OK) on a reasonably calm day is a very good skill building exercise and that it is well worth the small risk above 1500 AGL or so.

Geez Don, demonstrating ignorance of standard tow signals while calling everyone who use them idiots? Not smart.

Ramy

"Only a complete idiot would attempt steering turns"
I am really biting my tongue to now respond with an equally poor rant.

Steering turns were part of my initial glider training at Minden and have been part of my biannual flight reviews on and off for over twenty years at several different soaring sites. I just completed a flight review at Williams Soaring Center and steering turns were part of the review. I actually was directed to make the tow plane make a 180 degree turn using steering turns.

No wonder persons of authority that have to deal with the public tend to drink heavily after a day of work. People are sooooo special.