![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, August 3, 2015 at 3:22:37 PM UTC-7, Darryl Ramm wrote:
I think what strategically happens for TABS, for better or worse, is in the hands of large potential drone operators and manufacturers and their lobbyists. So should be lobbying for a TABS solution for gliders, and at the same time push for being able to use it in class A airspace? Sure would be nice to be able to get up to cloudbase in the Great Basin area. I'm guessing there's very little traffic near the bottom of this airspace out in this neck of the woods. And ATC could learn how to deal with us since we're pretty much stationary compared everyone else. 5Z |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, August 3, 2015 at 7:27:16 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Monday, August 3, 2015 at 3:22:37 PM UTC-7, Darryl Ramm wrote: I think what strategically happens for TABS, for better or worse, is in the hands of large potential drone operators and manufacturers and their lobbyists. So should be lobbying for a TABS solution for gliders, and at the same time push for being able to use it in class A airspace? Sure would be nice to be able to get up to cloudbase in the Great Basin area. I'm guessing there's very little traffic near the bottom of this airspace out in this neck of the woods. And ATC could learn how to deal with us since we're pretty much stationary compared everyone else. 5Z I think any lobbying should carefully lay out what would make TABS suitable for the glider community. And I would include Class A use of TABS in that.....and lots of things about easy installation regulations and more, work with EAA and AOPA on use of TABS Class B devices in towplanes (and all GA aircraft) say near Class C/B airspace instead of full 1090ES Out. But I would expect Class A stuff to apply to block IFR clearance for those Sierra Wave big dogs and use in wave windows where necessary, as transponders are today.. Hoping for a radical change to Class A use is probably a bit much. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Darryl,
Thanks for the information. That was a lot to think about. I submitted my response to the FAA online just a bit ago. Only 123 responses so far. Several were pro transponder - tended to come from airline and 121 operators. Mark |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flarm IGC files on non-IGC certified Flarm? | Movses | Soaring | 21 | March 16th 15 09:59 PM |
Guitar Chords/Tabs for "Ridge Runner" | [email protected] | Soaring | 3 | November 20th 08 05:00 AM |
IFR Alternate Requirement | gwengler | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | May 18th 05 02:26 PM |
Mode S to become requirement? | Bob Chilcoat | Owning | 6 | July 14th 04 11:25 PM |
New Castle ELT Requirement | Ed Byars | Soaring | 16 | June 19th 04 06:15 PM |