A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Lift pins



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 29th 19, 11:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,383
Default Lift pins

OK....stupid question....most FRP works better in tension (from what I know) than compression.
Sooooo.....why is top layer of spar thicker than bottom (I will assume.....yes, I know what assume can mean....) since I will assume bottom of spar has more tension than top (which I will assume is in compression).

Not picking, just asking based on your post....
  #2  
Old July 29th 19, 11:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,124
Default Lift pins

On Monday, July 29, 2019 at 6:27:07 PM UTC-4, Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot) wrote:
OK....stupid question....most FRP works better in tension (from what I know) than compression.
Sooooo.....why is top layer of spar thicker than bottom (I will assume.....yes, I know what assume can mean....) since I will assume bottom of spar has more tension than top (which I will assume is in compression).

Not picking, just asking based on your post....


More cross section is required to resist buckling.
UH
  #3  
Old July 30th 19, 12:06 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bob Kuykendall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,345
Default Lift pins

On Monday, July 29, 2019 at 3:27:07 PM UTC-7, Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot) wrote:
OK....stupid question....most FRP works better in tension (from what I know) than compression.
Sooooo.....why is top layer of spar thicker than bottom...


As Uncle Hank says, the upper spar cap is generally in compression, and the lower cap is in tension. The compression force in the upper spar cap is about the same as the tensile force in the lower cap. But since composites are generally weaker in compression, you might want to give the upper spar cap more cross-sectional area so that the stress (force per unit area) is lower. Or, another way of looking at it is that you are leaving some unnecessary material out of the lower spar cap since you don't need as much there to react the tensile forces.

The result, of course, is a set of wings that can support a greater load factor in normal flight than while inverted. But since most gliders are neither intended nor used for high-g inverted flight, it's a reasonable compromise, especially when you're dealing with relatively low strength-to-weight materials like wood or fiberglass.

With my gliders, I use the same amount of carbon in both the upper and lower spar caps. It makes it easier to fabricate the wing spars, and with the high-strength Graphlite material the weight penalty is negligible.

Thanks, Bob K.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tapered pins (again) [email protected] Soaring 22 April 28th 18 03:06 AM
Grob 109 wing pins Bob Jenneson Soaring 6 April 11th 09 10:45 PM
ASW-15B spar pins [email protected] Soaring 1 May 9th 06 12:46 AM
Shear Pins for Propellors? Rich Lemert Piloting 25 April 3rd 05 09:04 PM
taper pins Ernest Christley Home Built 4 September 12th 03 03:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.