A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Wake vortices... a sterile danger?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 19th 05, 07:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wake vortices... a sterile danger?

fwiw, make that turn request upwind if you can.

  #2  
Old December 19th 05, 07:31 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wake vortices... a sterile danger?


"Ramapriya" wrote in message

.... a string of aircraft took off
virtually tailing one another. Most of them were A330s, and the rest
were 747s and A340s, with the odd A320 and 737.

Makes me ask you folk this... are wake vortex caveats for real?


Very real. But, when you say "tailing one another", how tight do you mean?
What was your estimate of the separation? 1 minute? 2 minutes? 30
seconds? 10 seconds? There is no hard wingtip or flap edge vortex until
the wing starts to generate substantial lift, and these vortices tend to
sink at about 500 fpm quite promptly. So a lot of similar performance
aircraft with 1 minute separation will mostly be climbing out above the
vortices from the craft in front.


  #3  
Old December 20th 05, 02:47 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wake vortices... a sterile danger?

John Gaquin wrote:

when you say "tailing one another", how tight do you mean?
What was your estimate of the separation? 1 minute? 2 minutes? 30
seconds? 10 seconds? There is no hard wingtip or flap edge vortex until


1 minute.

  #4  
Old December 19th 05, 08:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wake vortices... a sterile danger?

Makes me ask you folk this... are wake vortex caveats for real? How do
you manage when in a queue of big jets?


If you're talking about programming a 777, I have no idea. I suspect
it's not as big a deal for them, as you observed.

If you're talking about flying a Spam Can *behind* a 777, then wake
vortex danger is VERY real. I've only run into it (literally!) once,
when I landed too close behind a C-130 in Albuquerque, and ended up in
a 60 degree bank on short final -- but that experience was enough of a
shock to make me very cautious behind big stuff.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

  #5  
Old December 19th 05, 08:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wake vortices... a sterile danger?

On 19 Dec 2005 12:29:17 -0800, "Jay Honeck" wrote
in .com::

If you're talking about flying a Spam Can *behind* a 777, then wake
vortex danger is VERY real.


http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/GenPDF.asp?...98FA210&rpt=fa
  #6  
Old December 19th 05, 09:51 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wake vortices... a sterile danger?


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message

....danger is VERY real. ......ended up in
a 60 degree bank on short final -- but that experience was enough of a
shock to make me very cautious behind big stuff.


You bet. This is one of those things that everyone talks about, and is
true. Just about everyone has hit a wake or knows someone who has. My
education came on a beautiful spring day about 25 years ago when I was on
final on a visual to 9 at BOS behind a DC9. I abruptly rolled right to
about 120 degrees of bank, and about as abruptly rolled back left to
approximately level. I forget what I told the pax.


  #7  
Old December 19th 05, 10:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wake vortices... a sterile danger?


"John Gaquin" wrote in message
. ..

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message

....danger is VERY real. ......ended up in
a 60 degree bank on short final -- but that experience was enough of a
shock to make me very cautious behind big stuff.


You bet. This is one of those things that everyone talks about, and is
true. Just about everyone has hit a wake or knows someone who has. My
education came on a beautiful spring day about 25 years ago when I was on
final on a visual to 9 at BOS behind a DC9. I abruptly rolled right to
about 120 degrees of bank, and about as abruptly rolled back left to
approximately level. I forget what I told the pax.


You probably told them that the smell in the cabin was from a nearby
rendering plant.


  #8  
Old December 19th 05, 10:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wake vortices... a sterile danger?

For what it's worth, always land long behind heavy iron, and take off
well short of where they rotated.

  #9  
Old December 19th 05, 11:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wake vortices... a sterile danger?


"Ramapriya" wrote in message
oups.com...
I was at a place today from where I had a nice, clear view of the Dubai
Airport runway all day long. For about 3 hours in the morning, and
another 2-hour period in the afternoon, a string of aircraft took off
virtually tailing one another. Most of them were A330s, and the rest
were 747s and A340s, with the odd A320 and 737.

Makes me ask you folk this... are wake vortex caveats for real? How do
you manage when in a queue of big jets?

Ramapriya
ayirpamarATgmailDOTcom


Wake vortices are very real and they can ruin your whole day if you let 'em.

I was standing right under the approach path at Lakeland Linder (during the
Sun N Fun fly-in) when a DC-9 landed. 20 seconds or so later, after the jet
noise faded, you could hear the vortices it left behind. It sounded like
someone was tearing apart a bedsheet the size of a football field. Then, the
vortices descended to ground level and whipped up twin horizontal tornados
of the fine grey sand they have down there. Tents flapped and towels shook
in the wind, and after a few more seconds it all faded away.

It was kind of spooky, but very impressive.

KB



  #10  
Old December 20th 05, 12:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wake vortices... a sterile danger?

I was standing right under the approach path at Lakeland Linder (during
the Sun N Fun fly-in) when a DC-9 landed. 20 seconds or so later, after
the jet noise faded, you could hear the vortices it left behind. It
sounded like someone was tearing apart a bedsheet the size of a football
field. Then, the vortices descended to ground level and whipped up twin
horizontal tornados of the fine grey sand they have down there. Tents
flapped and towels shook in the wind, and after a few more seconds it all
faded away.


We used to watch airliners land at Milwaukee's Mitchell Field (now Mitchell
International). When the wind was right, you could park right beneath the
approach path, and they'd go right over our heads, maybe 100 feet off the
ground.

The ripping sound made by their wingtip vortices was really amazing, just as
you describe. They would swirl all around you, long after the plane was
gone.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wake Turbulence behind an A-380 Jay Honeck Piloting 23 November 29th 05 04:14 AM
Wake Turbulence Question HankPilot2002 Piloting 11 July 14th 04 04:49 AM
Wake turbulence avoidance and ATC Peter R. Piloting 24 December 20th 03 11:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.