![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken Kochanski (KK) wrote:
I understand, a wing will perform optimally when the flap is set at the proper angle for the airspeed ... any mismatch of flap to airspeed will result in some performance losses vs. the correct setting. Of course, we have a couple of compromises here ... the flaps are set at fixed increments and the airspeed varies continuously ... so by design, you will rarely have the flap and airspeed matched up perfectly. I remember seeing a story where one of the German schools modified an LS-3 with springs, etc. so it automatically put in the correct amount of flap for the airspeed ... did this result in a measurable improvement? Along the same lines, I have heard some pilots say they put the flap in a position where they feel no pressure ... does this work? I myself tend to go negative quicker or maintain a negative setting longer ... then pulling in positive flap ... thinking being too positive is more costly then too negative ... is this valid? Its well worth digging out Dick Johnson's reports on flapped gliders and looking at the combined polar he plots - the one showing polars for all flap settings. The polars for the ASW-20 blend quite nicely except at the ends of the speed range for each setting and the available speed range gets smaller for each setting at more positive settings. The implication, I suppose, is that selecting the right flap is more critical at lower airspeeds. The same may apply to other gliders too: I haven't looked. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I find with my PIK that my pull ups are much better with the flaps
full negative until I get below 65 kts. I then slowly transition them to +8 if I'm going to circle, but only to 0 if I'm going to pass through the lift and go on. It seems that I waste less time and energy if I go ahead and transition back to -8 as I nose over to go on. I've often wondered if I'm doing this correctly, but it seems to work. Jack Womack |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
2 cents, I've personally noticed generally good performance in my 20B
when I "float" the flaps while driving. The 20 seems to be fairly well suited for this proceedure as other ships may not be for a variety of reasons as noted in one of the posts. RC-21 On Jul 10, 9:49 am, "Ken Kochanski (KK)" wrote: I understand, a wing will perform optimally when the flap is set at the proper angle for the airspeed ... any mismatch of flap to airspeed will result in some performance losses vs. the correct setting. Of course, we have a couple of compromises here ... the flaps are set at fixed increments and the airspeed varies continuously ... so by design, you will rarely have the flap and airspeed matched up perfectly. I remember seeing a story where one of the German schools modified an LS-3 with springs, etc. so it automatically put in the correct amount of flap for the airspeed ... did this result in a measurable improvement? Along the same lines, I have heard some pilots say they put the flap in a position where they feel no pressure ... does this work? I myself tend to go negative quicker or maintain a negative setting longer ... then pulling in positive flap ... thinking being too positive is more costly then too negative ... is this valid? KK |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 11, 11:01 am, Rick Culbertson wrote:
2 cents, I've personally noticed generally good performance in my 20B when I "float" the flaps while driving. The 20 seems to be fairly well suited for this proceedure as other ships may not be for a variety of reasons as noted in one of the posts. RC-21 Please describe exactly what you mean by "floating" the flaps. Jack |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Jack,
I'll attempt to clarify; My 1985 asw20b has the following five flap settings; #1 = -12' (high speed cruise) #2 = -6' #3 = 0 #4 = +9 (thermalling) #L = +38'/-8' (landing flaps) I also have an additional after market thermal setting between flap settings #3 & 4 When I speak of "floating the flaps" I'm referring to setting #1 through #3 but most often between the negative flap settings #1 & 2. Dick Johnson (as I recall) noted in his 1978 asw20 report that he notice the #2 flap setting didn't seem to produce a noticeable performance improvement verses the #1 setting and suggested perhaps a different/better flap setting was in order in this specific speed range. Additionally, some very talented former 20 drivers told me they "allowed" the flap handle to "float" between the negative settings with good results. Meaning, to the location of the least resistance. In practice I have found the handle will fairly easily slide to the next detent (flap setting) with increased speed and not as easily slide back to the previous one when speed is decreased. I generally keep my hand on the flap handle and feel for the change in pressure and assist it with slight pressure for or aft to stay in the area of least resistance. Of course when I leave a thermal and need to "get up to speed" quickly, I always lead or set the flaps in advance to the anticipated cruise speed setting. So what I'm generally referring to is not when your driving for the next 10 kt thermal at 100+ kts or when your floating along at best LD but when your varying between 70 and 90 kts. Additionaly I attempt to adjust subtile speed adjustments within this range with the flap handle verses using the elevator as has been sugested by some talented published pilots. My 1985 asw20b seems (IMHO) to be ideally suited for this practice and the feed back is quite pronounced. Conversely the same "former 20 drivers" have stated the ships they fly today, an asw27 and ash26e do not accept this kind of flap assistance at all. So this may be unique to the asw20 or similar ships of its era. In any event it seems to work well with my ship. I hope that's helpful, Rick - 21 On Jul 11, 6:21 pm, Jack wrote: On Jul 11, 11:01 am, Rick Culbertson wrote: 2 cents, I've personally noticed generally good performance in my 20B when I "float" the flaps while driving. The 20 seems to be fairly well suited for this proceedure as other ships may not be for a variety of reasons as noted in one of the posts. RC-21 Please describe exactly what you mean by "floating" the flaps. Jack |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nav radio settings in FMC | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 5 | January 10th 07 08:39 PM |
Warrior cruise RPM settings | lardsoup | Piloting | 35 | October 9th 05 11:59 PM |
Altimeter settings: QNH versus QFE | stephanevdv | Soaring | 25 | June 7th 05 08:06 AM |
ATC Altimeter Settings | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 81 | April 11th 05 08:07 PM |
L-nav Settings Ventus 2ct-18 | Oliver Peters | Soaring | 4 | July 18th 03 04:14 AM |