![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... Because that's what they write at all the Class D airports, as near as I can tell. They just look at the airport elevation, add 500', and put that on the chart. So where are some of these airports where the Class D airspace reaches only 500' AGL? The standard ceiling for Class D airspace is 2500 AGL, but they are charted in MSL values. Since field elevation at OQU is only 18 MSL and airspace is shown in hundreds of feet 2500 AGL becomes 25 on the chart. We have several Class D airports in our region that underlie the SeaTac Class B airspace. All have letters of agreement with the SEA approach facility reducing their Class D ceiling. In one case, the Class D ceiling is the Class B floor (BFI), and in the other cases, the reduced ceiling of the Class D either creates or expands a charted Class E area between the Class D and Class B airspace. The situation around BFI sounds most similar to yours, where the charted Class D overlaps with the Class C airspace. Controlled airspace is established by legislation and is not altered by letters of agreement between ATC facilities. Frankly, I find the whole thing very confusing. In the case of BFI, it's (almost) clear, because the floor of the Class B is clearly marked as being below the marked ceiling of the Class D. You know (that is, you can assume) you're either in Class D or Class B, and it's very clear where the Class B ends. But in the other cases, it's not clear at all if what's really going on is that the airspace ceded to the SEA approach facility winds up being Class E, or if it's Class D or Class B (and controlled by SEA App/Dep either way). I have always treated the ceded airspace as Class E and no one has ever taken me to task, even when I was on a tower frequency. So I presume that's fine to do. But the whole situation highlights the incredibly poor degree to which these letters of agreement and related arrangements are communicated to the pilots that they affect. When classes of airspace overlap, the operating rules associated with the more restrictive airspace class are applied. Class B airspace is more restrictive than Class C, Class C more restrictive than Class D, etc. Note that it is the rules of the more restrictive airspace that apply, not the more restrictive rule. So for all practical purposes, there is no overlap of airspace classes, the less restrictive class ends where the more restrictive class begins. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 06:12 AM |
| AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 07:12 PM |
| AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 12 | April 26th 04 07:12 PM |
| Violating Airspace with GPS | John Bell | Piloting | 57 | November 5th 03 09:25 PM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |