A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Simulators
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Lift and Angle of Attack



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8  
Old October 2nd 03, 11:55 PM
Mark Cherry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In ,
David wrote:

In article , Mark Cherry
writes

Sorry to be pedantic but, as far as I understand it, 'coefficients'
are physical constants. In this case, they are characteristics of a
particular airframe.

True, they are, but the lift coefficient is a property at a given
angle of attack so they are characteristics of an airframe but only
for a given angle of attack. For small angles of attack then the lift
coefficient depends almost directly on the angle of attack.

The parasitic drag coefficient will go in proportion to a
combination of frontal area and total surface area (note that the
frontal area presented to the relative wind will change with
variations in angle of attack, following a pitch control input). The
quantity of parasitic drag increases with the cube of the airspeed,
multiplied by this coefficient, mutiplied by the mass per unit time
of air flowing over it. (in kg.m.s-1 aka Watts, if I' m not
mistaken)


Generally speaking parasitic drag depends on the square of the speed.
Power required depends on the cube of the speed.

Drag is a force, measured in Newtons or pounds force. Drag is a force;
watts are power.

The classic drag equation is
D = 0.5*(air density) * (reference area - usually wing area) *(
(velocity)^2) * (drag coefficient)

where velocity is TAS NOT IAS.

You seem to be confusing Power required with the drag force.

But I see Peter Duniho has already posted corrections!



Similar thanks go to you. Dunno how that 'cubed' nonsense got in there. Call
it 'brain fade'...
Now let's see how much of this I remember in 6 month's time. ;-)



--
regards,

Mark


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tamed by the Tailwheel [email protected] Piloting 84 January 18th 05 05:08 PM
Newbie Qs on stalls and spins Ramapriya Piloting 72 November 23rd 04 05:05 AM
A very basic question Ramapriya Piloting 45 November 9th 04 02:57 PM
Rag and tube construction and computer models? BllFs6 Home Built 24 April 12th 04 01:20 PM
Angle of climb at Vx and glide angle when "overweight": five questions Koopas Ly Piloting 16 November 29th 03 11:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.