![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 21:41:57 GMT, "Dude" wrote:
I don't. I count at most one spin that could have been recoverable if the aircraft had conventional spin behavior (and it has yet been proven that the Cirrus can't be recovered by some control inputs). Your assertion of numerous crashes as a result of spins and/or deployments is not supported. Even by your own optimistic view it's only 4. Only 4? That seems like a lot for such a small fleet to me. I am amazed at how people seem to think that average is acceptable. A new design should be SAFER than a new 182 other 40 year old design of similar class. Progress is called for is it not? Not necessarily. The Cirrus design is a *high performance* airplane with "fixed feet". Pilots appear to be treating it like any other "fixed gear" airplane which it's not. On top of that they have the BRS and to cover an apparent and admitted inability to recover from a spin. So, you have, in general, pilots with a fixed gear attitude flying an airplane with a retract attitude. It is deceptively slippery. It is 20 knots faster than the typical Bo and is definitely not a short field aircraft. According to the pilots of the one on our field it is a plane you fly on, much like the G-III or Lancair IV. They specifically say it lands fast and is not a pane for full stall landings. I would be very interested in how it handles accelerated stalls. Overall in my opinion and it is just that, an opinion, the plane could use a larger tail and rudder. Any plane that whose POH says "pull the chute" in a spin, or steep spiral needs a bit more work. btw, there are 2 in the last few months, this and canada. Combine that with the guys that were "going out to practice stalls" and you have 3 that I know of. I couldn't get through all your guys mishmash to see Practicing stalls in high performance means that most likely, sooner or later, it is going to drop a wing. An uncoordinated stall brings a spin *entry*, but a real spin takes time to develop. If the pilot is not familiar with spins and high performance he/she is most likely to use the ailerons which will accelerate the entry. I do not know how Cirrus handles this situation, but the new owners out here said you do not do uncoordinated stalls in the SR-22. That scares me a bit as sooner or later one will happen, be it in rough air, or a mistake in practicing. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com what other one is arguable. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ballistic chute saves 4 souls | Bob Babcock | Home Built | 28 | April 27th 04 10:29 PM |