![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
" this thread is about s/n 3 or higher;"
There is a very good report on another ship in the US, which I assume is SN3 or higher and reports nothing of rumors that you are passing on. From Bill Liscomb's report on his ship: Off tow the fun really begins! It is easy to fly and the roll rate is downright snappy. As with most flapped ships, as the flaps go farther down, the adverse yaw goes up. But at normal climb/cruise settings it is not noticeable and control harmony is good. I haven't flown with other ships very much, so I can't claim any kind of remarkable thermalling performance. I do know this thing has climbed out of situations where my previous glider, a 304CZ, would have had problems. The flying weight of the Diana 2 (without water ballast) is about 25 pounds heavier than the empty weight of the 304CZ! Empty weight of my Diana 2 with instruments, battery, oxygen, etc., is 433 lbs. Then, there is the glide. Unreal! I'm still having trust issues with the glide computer. It seems impossible that a 15m ship has legs like this! The factory provides a nice sheet of linear graphs showing flap settings for speeds at different wing loading. The idea with the flap charts is you cut them out and stack them together with a glue stick. As you dump water, simply peel off charts until you get to your current wing loading. The correct flap setting is mandatory to get the best performance from this ship. In March of 2007, I did get to see what a load of bugs does. I checked out my black, fuzzy leading edges, then set the glide computer to 20% bugs and did a 30 mile final glide. I got back to Warner very high, dialed the bugs back to zero, and it showed my actual arrival altitude. I've done one flight with water ballast. I put in 43gallons (344 lbs) plus another 12lbs in the tail, which put me at just under 1,000lbs (1102 lbs is the maximum). This gave a wing loading of 10.6 lbs sq ft. (the dry wingloading is about 6.7 lbs sq ft). Once off tow, the water transforms the glider into a rocket. I felt like I was strapped inside a runaway locomotive. I flew on August 29th, 2006, a great day in So- Cal, and SeeYou showed two segments over 170 miles with no turns and average speeds 113 and 116mph. Landings are easy. I use the +21 flap setting rather than the +28 because of the wind we usually have at Warner Springs. This setting also increases aileron effectiveness while dealing with the normal crosswind shear, thermals and turbulence on final. Wheel landings are the norm - touch down, add full spoilers, put flaps full negative, hold the tail off, roll to a stop. The Diana 2 is small and light, both in the air and on the ground. It is a total blast to fly. Soaring in Southern California is unique in that a pilot can encounter several different air masses in one flight. Without water ballast, the Diana 2 is very capable of handling these conditions. It does very well in small, weak thermals as well as the big rowdy stuff, and has an amazing glide over a wide speed range. When it gets good, simply add water. Lots and lots of water... |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| master warning | Kevin | Simulators | 1 | July 27th 06 08:28 PM |
| unported flop tube | jasonlee | Aerobatics | 1 | June 1st 06 04:23 PM |
| Master Buss Bar? | ccwillwerth | Home Built | 18 | January 20th 06 03:32 AM |
| Master Switch | Lakeview Bill | Piloting | 23 | July 20th 05 02:46 AM |
| Master Jet Base | MICHAEL OLEARY | Naval Aviation | 24 | April 22nd 05 08:00 AM |