![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Lou" wrote 70 lbs is quite a bit difference. Don't be surprised if you have to move that engine forward for the W&B and to build a new cowling. Sequoia may not publicly back the idea, but I wouldn't be surprised if they kept in touch just to see how it's working. Also everyone involved must remember that this is an experimental category, so have fun experimenting. I agree, and also be thinking about the changes a cowl further forward will change the aerodynamics. I would think an aerodynamicist would recommend adding some area to the vertical and horizontal stabilizer, by adding some width and height, or other profile changes, or extending the length of the fuselage to get a longer tail moment arms. I think the Falco probably is designed with the tail areas at close to minimum areas to maximize performance. If there is area added in front of the center of pressure, and not compensated with changes behind the center, you will definitely become a test pilot in another critical way. -- Jim in NC |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Beautiful Falco | djm00 | Aviation Photos | 0 | May 13th 08 11:18 PM |
| Falco - Kit plane or Plans-built? | Rich S. | Home Built | 23 | August 19th 05 07:02 AM |
| Alternate requirements | Anthony Chambers | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | September 17th 03 10:45 PM |