A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Flight Data Recorders



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old September 9th 08, 02:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,aus.aviation
Michael Henry[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 42
Default Flight Data Recorders

David Lesher wrote:
... magnetic tape?! Surely we've come far enough that
we can be using solid-state storage in flight data recorders?


Does anyone know why FDRs would still be using what, to me, is archaic
technology?


Co$t is why. And while flash-based systems may offer more survivable
recording; consider the recent Qantas incident, where the
depressurization itself was overwritten by subsequent flight.


I can see how solid state storage is more expensive than tape, but I
would have thought that by the time you go through the whole
certification process the cost of the actual medium is just a small
fraction of the total cost... and if the solid state medium offers any
benefits over tape than that small extra cost would certainly be
justifiable.

The other issue you raise really surprises me: the small amount of
flight time for which recordings are kept. Some other posts have
mentioned half-an-hour loop! Does anyone know what volume of data this
entails?

Regards,

Michael


P.S. A quick mental calculation: I can go to Officeworks (in Australia)
and buy a 16 Gb memory stick for AU$100. OK, it's not going to meet the
same fault-tolerance and quality standards, but let's ignore that for
now For those of us in the iPod generation 16 Gb equates to around
300 hours of MP3 music. Obviously you would encode speech differently
and fit a lot more than that, but let's not worry about that. Of course
you also want to record other parameters (temperatures, pressures,
position of controls, etc). I'm just pulling numbers out of the air but
let's say you want to record 1,000 different parameters each sampled 10
times a second. Furthermore let's say the data for each parameter is
stored as a 32-bit value, which comes out to 40kb of data per second or
just under 150 Mb per hour. That's over 100 hours of parameters in our
16 Gb memory stick. Recording voice and data at the same time and I
figure you can fit about 80 flight hours in a $100 USB stick. Not bad
I'm obviously missing out on some important bits but it has made me
wonder: what would be the market for a really small, light, and cheap
uncertified flight data recorder...
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why so expensive (flight recorders) Jim Beckman Soaring 64 March 4th 08 03:18 PM
Standalone Flight Recorders for Club Use ContestID67 Soaring 8 April 24th 07 02:27 AM
Flight Data recorders on a 757 - What data? Al Dykes General Aviation 0 January 1st 07 06:09 PM
Commercial - Mounts for GPS Flight Recorders Paul Remde Soaring 0 March 13th 04 03:03 PM
Approved IGC Flight recorders mat Redsell Soaring 2 March 5th 04 04:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.