![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave,
This is an interesting topic. I don't fly out of your home airport but I have landed there many times. I live close so I spend a lot of my liesure time watching the traffic there. You are correct that they typically fly a fairly large pattern but it is not only the students. I can sit there and predict where the base to final turn will be and it is very consistent through the entire cross-section of pilots. I don't know if it's a new method training but I do think it is an unintended byproduct of the training. Students tend to think of each leg of the pattern as an event in and of itself. As such, they have the understandable need to stabilize each leg and go through the mental work of setting up the next leg. Many pilots retain this method of landing because it is what they learned and they are comfortable with it. And there is nothing wrong with that. That being said, there is a lot to be said for a tighter pattern. It sounds like something that the CFIs might want to present at their BFRs. You know, something like "Your landing pattern is fine, but now that you have xxx hours you may want to consider tightening the pattern up a little", followed by a demonstration. By the way, I have observed (strictly anecdotally) that taildraggers tend to fly a tighter pattern than us trike guys. ![]() Rich Russell On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:26:33 -0500, dave wrote: I was wondering the same thing. I own a Citabria and fly a tight pattern. When I trained in PA28-161's we flew tight patterns. I was taught to fly a pattern that will allow me to land if I lose the engine while in the pattern. The students at my home field train in new 172's. They fly, to my eye, very wide patterns. Maybe it's a newer training method? Dave Anyone else here like to fly a tight (or tighter than normal) pattern? The field we're based at (Falcon Field, FFC) has a pretty good-sized training operation, and there are a lot of students out practicing landings, especially on good days. What annoys me, though, is that some of these students fly huge patterns--like 2-mile finals, downwinds 1-2 miles out from the runway, etc. Sometimes, I'll end up behind somebody in the pattern, only to realize that, by the time he turns final, I could have done another touch and go and ended up behind him. IMHO, there's no reason to go flying a jet/heavy twin pattern in a Cessna. I've always tried to fly mine 4 white on the PAPI, with basically a continuous turn from downwind to final (leveling out for a second just to check traffic). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Auto engine bolt patterns | Ron Webb | Home Built | 12 | October 20th 04 01:35 PM |
Fly tight for tight bomb patterns on the ground. | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 120 | August 30th 04 08:42 AM |
Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 2 | August 27th 03 11:06 AM |
Aircraft bomb frag patterns | Mike D | Military Aviation | 6 | August 24th 03 05:16 AM |